Originally published October 31, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified November 3, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Comments (1)
E-mail article
Print view
Latest cause of adolescent angst: Teen car cams
Ken Richardson does not have to ride in his 17-year-old daughter's Ford Escort to know when she takes a turn too fast. The camera system installed...
The Washington Post
WASHINGTON — Ken Richardson does not have to ride in his 17-year-old daughter's Ford Escort to know when she takes a turn too fast.
The camera system installed in her car will e-mail him about it.
"She's at that age where she's a little rebellious," said Richardson, 54, of Lusby, Md. "And I'm at the age where I'm not gonna take any crap."
The Richardsons are among more than 100 families in Southern Maryland enrolled in a state-sponsored study of camera systems that record the moments before and after an unusual driving maneuver, such as sudden braking or a too-sharp turn. State officials say the cameras could save teenagers' lives.
Some of the teens have other thoughts on the matter.
"I feel like I'm being babysat, like I'm being watched constantly," said Stacie Richardson, Ken's daughter. "It drives me nuts."
The cameras are among the latest tools in the struggle to reduce teen car crashes, a problem that has been increasing. Vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for 15- to 20-year-olds. In 2006, 3,490 teen drivers died, and an additional 272,000 teens were injured.
Such accidents are often caused not by alcohol or overt recklessness but by simple inexperience. The problem has persisted despite efforts by lawmakers to restrict teen driving privileges.
"Really, the single most dangerous thing we let our children do is drive a car," said Daniel McGehee, director of the human factors and vehicle safety research program at the University of Iowa. "It's frustrating for those of us who study crashes in general."
Until recently, the in-car monitoring systems were used primarily by commercial companies interesting in monitoring their drivers. In the battle against driver inexperience, they are joined by other devices that keep a detailed log of a driver's speed or use GPS technology to constantly track the driver's position, said Bill Carpenter, an executive with DriveCam, the San Diego company that makes the cameras.
The camera, mounted on the front windshield, captures footage of what is happening outside as well as in the vehicle. It saves about 20 seconds of that footage only when its sensors are triggered by excessive G-forces. Those forces tend to accompany unusual driving maneuvers such as sudden braking or swerving.
Saved footage is transmitted back to DriveCam via a cellular network. DriveCam experts review the videos, add tips for the young drivers and post them to a Web site where parents can see them. Parents receive an e-mail alert when the videos are posted.
![]()
The camera can capture anything going on in the car, but the company uploads only footage that involves unsafe driving. "If an event is captured that is embarrassing to the teen ... then we're not going to return it to the family," Carpenter said.
In the month or so since the camera was installed, Stacie has not been caught on camera doing anything too bad. But it has been a source of household division since Richardson told his daughter it would be installed, whether she liked it or not.
Richardson has tried every possible angle to convince his daughter that the camera is a good idea. He has tried telling her she could earn new driving privileges by avoiding major incidents. He has appealed to her sense of benevolence, telling her that being a part of the study could save others' lives. And he has tried telling her that when she gets older, she'll want the same kind of device for her kids.
"Whatever. I don't want to hear it," Stacie said, rolling her eyes and crossing arms.
Research on DriveCam seems to support Dad.
McGehee, the University of Iowa researcher, tracked 25 new drivers for more than a year. The six that McGehee classified as "high-frequency drivers," meaning they triggered the camera frequently early on, did so 86 percent less after using the DriveCam and feedback system. The study was funded by American Family Insurance, which offering the cameras free to young drivers it insures.
Cameras typically cost $900 for the hardware, installation and a year of service, Carpenter said. After the first year, the service costs $30 a month.
Ken Richardson, a former firefighter and paramedic, has seen the consequences of driver inexperience.
"The last thing I want is to get a call in the middle of the night or a knock on the door," he said. "This is one of those issues where I have total control. If you want to drive, you're going to have a camera in your car."
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Toyota unveils 2010 Prius that boasts 50 mpg
GM unveils battery plan, may need more loans
Chinese automakers face headwinds to US sales
Meltdown 101: Why are auto shows still important?
Automotive Q&A: Hot on trail of pickup engine's overheating problem

2009 fireworks time lapse
With strict parking rules enforced at this year's July 4th celebration on Wallingford Ave North, less cars and more spectators filled the streets.
Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Tax tips for new independent professionals
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new compact car? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
nwhomes

Find a new home or condo that fits your lifestyle.
Search New Developments
Builder Directory
- Landmark Smith Tower mostly vacant
- Property taxes: Appeals shoot up in King, Snohomish Counties
- Palin links resignation to 'higher calling' and blasts media in Facebook posting
- Shooting unveils very different sides of McNair
- Former NFL MVP McNair killed
- Hard times for tourist towns means good deals for travelers
- Tukwila residents rally against light-rail noise
- Quincy Jones remembers "the biggest entertainer on the planet": Michael Jackson
- Confessions of an Idol Addict | "American Idols" on tour: Live coverage from opening date
- Plasma and LCD beware; OLED screens ready to go mainstream
- Seattle Mariners at Boston Red Sox: 07/05 game thread
247 - Palin links resignation to 'higher calling' and blasts media in Facebook posting
177 - Hatred for the NBA runs deep, but don't take it out on the players
137 - Tukwila residents rally against light-rail noise
126 - Former NFL MVP McNair killed
113 - Property taxes: Appeals shoot up is King, Snohomish Counties
103 - Tent City on campus: UW stalls decision
101 - Anti-tax rally in Olympia attracts about 1,500
68 - Seeking your questions
53 - Mariners did their part, now they need help
46
- Property taxes: Appeals shoot up in King, Snohomish Counties
- Hard times for tourist towns means good deals for travelers
- Landmark Smith Tower mostly vacant
- Plasma and LCD beware; OLED screens ready to go mainstream
- Tent City on campus: UW stalls decision
- The People's Pharmacy | Estrogen mimicker found in sunscreen
- Toyota's Toyoda scolds execs for emulating U.S. car companies' mistakes
- Tukwila residents rally against light-rail noise
- Outdoor-theater season kicks off at Volunteer Park
- Seattle safety project: A snake shelter on Beacon Hill









