Friday, June 27, 2008 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
Automotive Q&A
Primo information about premium gas
Q: I have a 1992 non-turbo Volvo 240. My manual specifies premium gas, but being frugal, I've asked about changing to regular gas. I receive mixed responses...
Q: I have a 1992 non-turbo Volvo 240. My manual specifies premium gas, but being frugal, I've asked about changing to regular gas. I receive mixed responses, some dire. What say you?
A: Many vehicles specify premium fuel. This may be due to the engine having a higher compression ratio, a slower burning combustion chamber design, or the use of a turbo or supercharger. Using regular instead can cause:
• Detonation, or knocking: The air-fuel mixture explodes rather than burns properly. This can burn a hole in or break a piston, or damage the head gasket. Detonation may or may not be audible.
• Preignition, or pinging: The air-fuel mixture self-ignites prior to the spark plug firing. The extended burn time and flaming can also damage pistons, valves, or the spark plug. Pinging is usually audible.
Some engines employ a detonation sensor. The engine control computer reacts by retarding ignition timing until it stops, and adapts ignition advance for the best detonation-free performance.
Using lower octane fuel than specified might be OK, particularly during cooler weather (summer's not the time to take this gamble), with short trips, or with a detonation-sensor-equipped engine. It's risky, though, as the cost of preignition or detonation damage can be huge.
Also, if the ignition timing is frequently being retarded due to sensed detonation, fuel economy and engine performance will suffer, perhaps neutralizing the cost savings of the cheaper fuel.
If this helps, the greater engine performance provided by a premium fuel engine may offset the greater cost of the fuel.
Accelerating a bit more gently and anticipating, then coasting to slowdowns and stops ahead can make a big difference in fuel economy. I've found slowing from 70 to 61 mph (my vehicle's most efficient speed) results in an increase of 4 mpg.
E-mail Brad Bergholdt at under-the-hood@juno.com.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Automotive Q&A: Gauging gas mileage
"One Ford" plan will rush fuel-efficient cars to the U.S.

This feature requires Flash 7.
Top video | World | Science / Tech | Entertainment
Best Northwest Employers
Vote for your favorite Northwest employers in the 2008 NWjobs People's Picks contest. Vote now.
- Carnation girl, 14, found starved to 48 pounds
- 5 students from Afghanistan missing from UW
- Palin fiance sets record straight | Campaign Notebook
- CPS reviewing case of starved 14-year-old in Carnation
- Boeing, striking Machinists hit impasse in new talks
- Hunter killed near Chelan by accident
- 5 more Afghan scholars missing from UW
- King County to lay off up to 255 workers
- Apple's $999 entry laptop
- Shaun Alexander appears set to sign with Washington Redskins
- Carnation girl, 14, found starved to 48 pounds
- Sarah Palin and the mean wink | Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist
- Elk in Packwood could soon be hunted
- 5 students from Afghanistan missing from UW
- With new club, The Mountaineers reach out
- Hawaii coin marks end of state quarter program
- Boeing, striking Machinists hit impasse in new talks
- 5 more Afghan scholars missing from UW
- Chico Hot Springs: Soaking up a quintessentially Montana experience
- Boeing, Machinists at loggerheads
