Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Saturday, March 5, 2011 at 8:28 AM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Another appeal filed over Burke-Gilman Trail expansion in Ballard

A Ballard business group has filed an appeal over the expansion of a portion of the Burke-Gilman Trail in Ballard.

Seattle Times staff reporter

Another appeal has been filed over expansion of the Burke-Gilman Trail in Ballard.

This time, marine and trade interests have joined to form Ballard Business Appellants, which is asking the Seattle Hearing Examiner to review a decision issued last month by the Seattle Department of Transportation.

The Transportation Department found that the trail extension through Ballard is unlikely to have a significant impact on the environment.

The review leading to the Transportation Department's decision was ordered last year by King County Superior Court Judge Jim Rogers, who upheld most of the proposed trail through Ballard but said one section, from 17th Avenue Northwest to Northwest Vernon Place, must undergo an environmental review.

The city decided not to appeal that ruling, did the review and released it last month. Rogers' ruling delayed the $14 million project that would complete the popular trail through Seattle.

The dispute was over the so-called "missing link," which stretches along Shilshole Avenue Northwest from 11th Avenue Northwest near the Ballard Fred Meyer store to the Ballard Locks.

In its appeal, the newly formed trade group said it wants a trail that is safe and does not undermine the viability of the marine and industrial businesses in Ballard.

"This is about safety," said Josh Brower, an attorney representing the trade group. "My clients ... are asking the city to study this issue and prove this trail design and location are safe, not just continue saying the trail is safe."

Susan Gilmore: 206-464-2054 or sgilmore@seattletimes.com

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Local News

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River

NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

More Local News headlines...

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Not again! This is the most poorly managed process I have ever seen, a few businesses get to obstruct a trail that will provide for the entire...  Posted on March 5, 2011 at 9:27 AM by anarchitect. Jump to comment
It strikes me that one way to prove that the trail is safe is to build it. But this whole notion of proving safety is just a misleading legal...  Posted on March 5, 2011 at 9:11 AM by Cowtipper. Jump to comment
are you kdding me? the businesses are worried about bycicle safety? anything would be more safe than the current arrangment. i'm no friend of...  Posted on March 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM by Fang1. Jump to comment

advertising

Video

Advertising

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising