Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, November 17, 2010 at 5:03 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Jury rejects Somali family's civil-rights claims over failed drug bust

A federal jury in Seattle has rejected claims by a Somali family that their rights were violated when armed narcotics officers entered their home without announcing themselves during a 2006 federal crackdown on the illegal stimulant called "khat."

Seattle Times staff reporter

A federal jury in Seattle has rejected claims by a Somali family that their rights were violated when armed narcotics officers entered their home without announcing themselves during a 2006 federal crackdown on the illegal stimulant "khat."

Ali Dualeh, his wife and their five children were taken into federal custody by members of the Valley Narcotics Task Force, under the supervision of the Drug Enforcement Administration, as part of a national crackdown called Operation Somali Express.

Dualeh was never convicted of a crime.

The national raids — including 17 searches and 19 arrests in the Seattle area — targeted a national distribution network of the leafy herb known as khat, which is illegal in the U.S. but commonplace in the Horn of Africa, where it has been chewed for centuries as a mildly euphoric stimulant.

Dualeh had initially claimed that officers roughed him up and pointed firearms at his wife and young children — the oldest was 8 at the time during the raid at their Kent home. His wife claimed that she was forced to remain in the presence of the officers without wearing a head scarf, in violation of her Muslim beliefs.

Most of those allegations were dismissed or thrown out by U.S. District Judge Thomas Zilly before trial.

The sole issue to make it to the jury involved allegations that the officers violated the requirement that they "knock and announce" themselves before entering the home, in keeping with the Fourth Amendment's protections against illegal searches and seizures.

But the officers claimed that the search team was compromised as they moved across an apartment parking lot when they were seen by someone in an upstairs window. As a result, they said concerns for officer safety and evidence protection justified their breaking into the apartment without first announcing themselves.

The jury deliberated 90 minutes before finding in favor of the officers Tuesday following a three-day trial.

Earlier this year, the federal government paid another Somali woman, Habibo Jama, $40,000 to settle her claim that officers ignored her pleas to allow her to cover herself during another "Operation Somali Express" raid at her home.

In hindsight, federal law-enforcement officials have acknowledged that the raids were ill-conceived and alienated the U.S. Somali community, which has been targeted for recruiting by Islamic militants.

Mike Carter: 206-464-3706 or mcarter@seattletimes.com

Information from Seattle Times archives is included in this report.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Local News

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River

NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

More Local News headlines...

News where, when and how you want it

Email Icon

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising