Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published November 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM | Page modified November 24, 2009 at 9:33 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Kirkland annexation barely fails; council could pass it

An effort to annex the neighborhoods of Finn Hill, Kingsgate and Juanita into the city of Kirkland failed to reach the required 60 percent. The Kirkland City Council is considering whether to take a vote to still annex the unincorporated neighborhoods into the city.

Seattle Times Eastside reporter

A vote by three unincorporated neighborhoods to join the city of Kirkland failed by just 0.06 percent.

According to the final tally released by King County Elections today, 59.94 percent of residents of Finn Hill, Kingsgate and Juanita voted to annex into the city of Kirkland but were still short of the required 60 percent.

However, because more than 50 percent of the voters said yes to annexation, the Kirkland City Council still can vote to approve annexation, officials said.

The council likely will start discussing annexation at a budget meeting next week and consider whether a vote should take place this year or in January, when a new council is seated, said Mayor Jim Lauinger, who did not run for re-election.

The annexation vote included approval of a bond measure intended to spread the city's current debt on parks and fire services among the annexed residents, but according to state law redistributing the debt requires voters' approval, officials said.

The annexation would have added 33,000 residents from unincorporated King County into the city, increasing the current population to nearly 83,000. More than 10,000 residents cast votes on the proposed annexation, with 6,291 voting "yes" and 4,205 voting "no."

There is no automatic recount for ballot measures, said an election spokeswoman, but a recount can be requested within three days of certification by a group of five registered voters.

Scott Brady, who ran a Web site opposing annexation, said he was happy with the results and felt the facts about Kirkland's current budget problems appealed to voters.

But with the City Council considering voting on annexation, Brady and other organizers are discussing their next step, he said.

"We'll be there to remind the City Council that Kirkland is penniless and cutting vital services even without the cost of annexation, and that they cannot provide the service level they have advertised throughout the process," he said.

Toby Nixon, who had been helping lead the pro-annexation effort, along with other organizers, already has been talking to council members about voting to annex the neighborhoods. He said he felt there was a good chance the council will approve it.

"The annexation itself is an overwhelmingly positive vote," he said. "A 59.94 percent vote is a landslide if you're talking about a vote on the annexation itself."

Nicole Tsong: 206-464-2150 or ntsong@seattletimes.com

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Local News

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River

NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

More Local News headlines...

I live in the PAA and voted no for annexation. Frankly I see no benefit and don't believe my taxes will be lower as advertised. I personally...  Posted on November 24, 2009 at 1:47 PM by Kires1. Jump to comment
Just keep voting no. All the cities are looking for are additional revenue streams and all the currently un-annexed neighborhoods will be footing...  Posted on November 24, 2009 at 5:42 PM by 5wide. Jump to comment
I live in the PAA and voted no on annexation. I was thrilled with this news, after all the initial reports were saying that annexation had passed...  Posted on November 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM by brianhh. Jump to comment

advertising


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising