Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Politics & Government


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published August 31, 2009 at 12:11 PM | Page modified September 2, 2009 at 3:33 PM

Comments (827)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Corrected version

Wash. judge to rule Wednesday on challenge to R-71

A judge says she'll decide Wednesday whether to block a public vote on expanded domestic partnership benefits in Washington state.

Associated Press Writer

SEATTLE —

A judge says she'll decide Wednesday whether to block a public vote on expanded domestic partnership benefits in Washington state.

King County Superior Court Judge Julie Spector is expected to rule even as Secretary of State Sam Reed prepares to certify the measure for the November ballot.

The so-called "everything but marriage" law was supposed to take effect in July. But conservative Christians mounted a referendum campaign, and Reed says they have more than the 120,000 signatures necessary to force a public vote.

Supporters of the law sued to keep Referendum 71 off the ballot. They argued that thousands of signatures were invalid because declarations attesting that voters were not paid or wrongly induced to provide their signatures were left blank or simply rubber-stamped.

Spector heard arguments on Monday. Reed's office says the judge doesn't have jurisdiction, and that any challenge must be brought in Thurston County after the measure is certified.

An earlier version of this story, published Monday, Aug. 31 and corrected Monday, Aug. 31, misidentified Gary Randall's organization. He is a member of Protect Marriage Washington.

Copyright © The Seattle Times Company

More Politics headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

my apologies jamesb* i misunderstood the ballot measure i thought voting yes meant saying no to the expanded rights does anyone else find the...  Posted on August 31, 2009 at 3:07 PM by purpledawghaze. Jump to comment
your wrong, It's going to confuse people...apparently already has.....you vote to approve 71 if you want the law to take effect. You...  Posted on August 31, 2009 at 3:09 PM by jamesb*. Jump to comment
Why is the civil rights of two taw paying adults being put up for a public vote?  Posted on August 31, 2009 at 3:04 PM by jim7. Jump to comment

advertising


Get home delivery today!

More Politics

NEW - 10:32 AM
Landrieu to vote to move ahead on health-care bill

Constantine to trim personal staff and salaries

Republicans blast 'bait and switch' health bill

AP sources: Giuliani leaning toward Senate run

Ethics committee: No punishment for Burris

Advertising

Video

LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Los Angeles Galaxy's David Beckham talks about the upcoming MLS Cup final during after a team practice.

Real Salt Lake's Kyle Beckerman
MLS trophy arrives in Seattle
Chittenden Locks Inspection
Full interview with New Moon actors
Interview with New Moon actors
Artistic Roller Skating
Girls Soccer: Mercer Island vs. Glacier Peak
Smash Putt! Miniature Golf
Opening day at Crystal Mountain

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising