Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published July 25, 2009 at 5:14 PM | Page modified July 26, 2009 at 11:00 PM

Comments (441)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Wash. gay partnership foes turn in signatures

Sponsors of a campaign to overturn Washington state's domestic partnership law turned in their petition signatures Saturday and said they believe they have enough to force a public vote.

Associated Press Writer

OLYMPIA, Wash. —

Sponsors of a campaign to overturn Washington state's domestic partnership law turned in their petition signatures Saturday and said they believe they have enough to force a public vote.

The expanded "everything but marriage" domestic partnership law was scheduled to take effect Sunday, but is now delayed until the signatures can be counted, a process that could take up to a month.

To qualify for the November ballot, supporters of Referendum 71 must have 120,577 voter signatures. Supporters say they have about 138,000 signatures.

"I feel our signatures are pretty clean," said campaign spokesman Gary Randall.

If they have enough signatures, the law will be delayed until the outcome of the referendum. If they fall short, the domestic partnership expansion will immediately take effect.

The signatures were turned in a day after opponents of the new law announced a final push to force a public vote, calling their effort "too close to call" and asking people to show up on Saturday at the Capitol to turn in their signatures to the secretary of state's office.

Greg MacPherson of Kent, Wash. said he drove two hours in traffic to turn in about a dozen signatures.

"We want to stand up and be counted," he said.

The new domestic partnership law expands on Washington's existing partnerships. The newest version adds registered domestic partners to all remaining areas of state law that presently apply only to married couples. Those statutes range from adoption and child support rights and obligations, to pensions and other public employee benefits.

The underlying domestic partnership law, which passed the Legislature two years ago, provided hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations, and inheritance rights when there is no will.

Last year, lawmakers expanded it to give domestic partners standing under laws covering probate and trusts, community property and guardianship.

Josh Friedes, a spokesman for Washington Families Standing Together, said that if the referendum does end up on the ballot, he is optimistic that voters will retain the law.

advertising

"We need to have a conversation about the needs of gay and lesbian families," he said. "So in some ways, this referendum brings to the foreground a lot of issues, and to that extent the dialogue can propel the movement forward."

A political group called WhoSigned.Org has already said it will publish online the names of people who signed petitions. The petition-listing effort is not supported by the official campaign trying to keep R-71 off the ballot.

---

The domestic partnership bill is Senate Bill 5688.

---

On the Net:

Legislature: http://www.leg.wa.gov

Washington Families Standing Together: http://www.wafst.org

Protect Marriage Washington: http://www.protectmarriagewa.com/

Domestic partnership information: http://www.secstate.wa.gov/corps/domesticpartnerships

WhoSigned.Org: http://www.whosigned.org

Copyright © The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Dear Literate resident, I too used to sign initiative that I might not support in the actual election - based on the belief that people voting...  Posted on July 25, 2009 at 8:32 PM by Jim L. Jump to comment
Name calling only brings you to level of those who are arrogant enough to think their way is the only way. Why not provide information that will...  Posted on July 25, 2009 at 7:14 PM by Tesi. Jump to comment
The signatures are already public information - or this wouldn't be possible. Yes, it probably is meant to intimidate, and I don't...  Posted on July 25, 2009 at 8:22 PM by Jim L. Jump to comment


Get home delivery today!

More Local News

UPDATE - 11:34 PM
Teen is beaten in bus tunnel; Metro to review policies

UPDATE - 12:15 AM
School levies passing in most area districts

NEW - 10:16 PM
Medical pot exceeds law, but no charges

Seattle physician Brian Krabak will do more than treat injuries at Winter Olympics

NEW - 10:39 PM
Two names dominate as Seattle begins police-chief search

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising