Originally published Saturday, July 25, 2009 at 12:00 AM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print
Share
Will foes hold up gay benefits?
The state's latest expansion of domestic partnerships for gay couples was hanging in limbo Friday as opponents announced a final push to force a public vote, calling their effort so far "too close to call."
The Associated Press
OLYMPIA — The state's latest expansion of domestic partnerships for gay couples was hanging in limbo Friday as opponents announced a final push to force a public vote, calling their effort so far "too close to call."
In a statement to supporters, organizers of the Referendum 71 campaign said they will have at least the minimum 120,577 petition signatures needed by today to qualify for the ballot.
However, R-71 organizer Gary Randall said the campaign doesn't have enough extra signatures to act as a cushion for erroneous or duplicate petition signatures, which must come from registered Washington voters.
Appeal to supporters
To help meet the deadline, Randall appealed to R-71 supporters to gather additional signatures and drive them to the state Capitol this afternoon.
"We're not trying to have a rally or anything," Randall said. "We need the signatures, we truly do."
The new "everything but marriage" expansion of domestic partnerships is scheduled to take effect Sunday, but the law will be delayed if referendum sponsors turn in their petitions.
If the campaign has enough valid signatures, the law would not take effect unless approved by voters in the November election.
Once the secretary of state's office receives the signatures today, they will go into a vault. The process of counting and verifying them begins next week, and verification could go until the last week of August, said Brian Zylstra, a spokesman for the secretary of state's office.
Impact of signatures
If they don't have enough signatures, the domestic-partnership expansion will immediately take effect. If the measure does qualify, voters will be asked to either approve or reject the new law.
Josh Friedes, a spokesman for Washington Families Standing Together, said that if the referendum does end up on the ballot, he is optimistic that voters will retain the law.
![]()
"We do not believe that the mere qualification of the referendum is a barometer of public opinion on the subject of protecting gay and lesbian families," he said.
The new domestic-partnership law expands on Washington's existing partnerships. The newest version adds registered domestic partners to all remaining areas of state law that now apply only to married couples. Those statutes range from adoption and child-support rights and obligations, to pensions and other public-employee benefits.
Partnership law
The underlying domestic partnership law, which passed the Legislature two years ago, provided hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations, and inheritance rights when there is no will.
Last year, lawmakers expanded it to give domestic partners standing under laws covering probate and trusts, community property and guardianship.
Under state law, opposite-gender seniors also can register as domestic partners.
State Sen. Ed Murray, a Seattle Democrat and gay lawmaker who spearheaded the original law, said the state has taken an incremental approach in the domestic partnerships "so we could engage citizens in a conversation and not a cultural war."
"What proponents of Referendum 71 want to do is engage in a cultural war."
As of this week, more than 5,700 domestic-partnership registrations had been filed in Washington since the first law took effect in July 2007.
A political group called WhoSigned.Org has already said it will publish online the names of people who signed petitions for the referendum. It is patterned after campaigns in other states where gay-rights ballot measures have been proposed.
Domestic-partnership opponents could have their names and other information published by the Web site only after R-71 petitions are verified by the secretary of state's office. At that point, the signed petitions are public records.
Friedes said the petition-listing effort is not supported by the official campaign trying to keep R-71 off the ballot.
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case
NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife
Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River
NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

nwautos
Are you one of the many hanging onto their old beater? Or do you just love that new-car smell? When did you last purchase a vehicle? Take our poll or....
Post a comment
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Proposal to link Market, aquarium may be too ambitious for Seattle
- Chilling 911 tapes reveal pleas for help to go to Josh Powell home
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- UW's Shawn Kemp Jr. makes own way despite familiar name, number | Steve Kelley
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- NBA's David Stern open to league returning to Seattle
- Prosecutor: Powell's final act ends doubt he killed wife
- Was idea of court-ordered test too much for Josh Powell?
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Here it is: The secret to stir-fried chicken | Taste
- Local aerospace suppliers say they feel squeezed by Boeing
- Dicks channeled federal money to Puget Sound project his son ran
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review
- Buttoned Up: Nine immutable laws of time management
- Happy Hour: French-accented charm at Gainsbourg
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature







