Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published June 30, 2009 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 30, 2009 at 11:39 AM

Comments (71)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

High court won't hear Kent schools Bible-club case

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the case between Kentridge High School and two former students who fought to form a Bible study group that excluded non-Christians from becoming voting members.

Seattle Times staff reporter

The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the case between Kentridge High School and two former students who fought to form a Bible study group that excluded non-Christians from becoming voting members.

"Obviously we were disappointed," said Tim Chandler, legal counsel for the former students. "We were hoping the Supreme Court would resolve it."

The school in 2003 denied a charter for the group, called Truth, saying its membership requirements discriminated against students who refused to sign a statement accepting Jesus as their personal savior. Truth founders argued that the school denied their First Amendment rights and violated the Equal Access Act by preventing them from forming a group according to their religious beliefs.

Truth's founders filed their case with one major question in mind: Can a school district refuse to charter student organizations that restrict membership based on religion?

District and appellate courts responded with a resounding "yes."

Usually when the Supreme Court refuses to hear a case, that means it's over, but a legal loophole means this six-year battle might stick around.

Lawyers for the two former students say they might refile the case — starting over in U.S. District Court — with a different legal question: Did Kentridge High School already allow something similar?

Attorneys are researching whether some boys' and girls' groups — what Lind calls "vestiges of an older age" — at the school might have once limited their membership based on gender, putting them in a similar legal situation as Truth.

New trial possible

"We're willing to keep fighting if we need to," Chandler said. He said his group, the Alliance Defense Fund, will continue to research the case, but their clients have not yet decided whether to begin another trial.

"It's not dead," acknowledged Chuck Lind, general counsel for the Kent School District.

The battle over Truth started in September 2001, when Sarice Undis, then a junior, and Julianne Stewart, then a sophomore, applied for a charter from the school's student council. Truth members, who originally could be students of any faith, would read a Bible verse over the school's intercom system once a week and decorate the school once a month.

advertising

For two years, nothing happened as the school waited for the result of a similar case that started in the Bethel School District, where a student was fighting to form a religious group. When the federal appeals court ruled that religion-based student groups do not violate laws governing the separation of church and state, Truth submitted a new application and threatened to file its own lawsuit unless the school approved it.

Rules to favor believers

The student council then met to discuss the group's new application, which removed the verse-of-the-week and monthly decoration provisions and changed membership requirements. Although all students could participate in the group, only those who professed "belief in the Bible and in Jesus Christ" could be voting members and officers.

In April 2003, the council voted not to approve the group, citing its name and the availability of other church-related groups on campus as reasons.

The group sued, and Undis and Stewart submitted a new application outlining stricter membership requirements. Officers and voting members of the group would be required to sign a "statement of faith" accepting Jesus Christ as their "personal savior" and the Bible as "the only infallible, authoritative Word of God." That charter was unanimously denied by the student council.

The students lost at trial and in a subsequent appeal, with both courts ruling the school district did not violate any rights by denying Truth's charter because of the group's membership provisions. Monday, the Supreme Court said it wouldn't hear the case.

"It's an important reaffirmation of what the separation of religion and government means in a school in a practical sense," said Doug Honig, spokesman for the Washington chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

In its opinion, the federal appeals court pointed out what Lind called "a factual dispute" — the school might have granted charters to groups that limited membership based on gender, such as the boys' and girls' honor clubs. The details are fuzzy, Lind said, but the discrepancy gives Truth a "narrow ground" to restart the case.

Chandler called the court's opinion "frightening" and said he'd hoped the Supreme Court would take the case to resolve it.

"The impacts of the decision are very broad," he said.

Cited in college dispute

The case already has been cited in a dispute at the University of California's Hastings Law School, where the Christian Legal Society was prohibited from receiving school sponsorship because it excluded non-Christians from serving as voting members, Chandler said.

Technically, the ruling could be applied by schools to all kinds of clubs, such as a Democrat group that prohibits Republicans from joining. However, the ruling most clearly applies to "protected classes" such as racial or ethnic groups, Lind said.

Lindsay Toler: 206-464-2463 or ltoler@seattletimes.com

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Comments (71)
The issue here is not the protection of faith. The issue here is having the school give financial support to a club that forces members to pledge...  Posted on June 30, 2009 at 7:32 AM by Calumet. Jump to comment
dmaninseattle has been owned so many times in this thread it isnt even funny. Actually, I find it very funny. Also, it is a Bible study....  Posted on June 30, 2009 at 1:54 PM by Go Seahawks. Jump to comment
Dmaninseattle - the point you're missing is that these students were given the freedom of assembly. They were not kept from meeting, they...  Posted on June 30, 2009 at 9:51 AM by dweb. Jump to comment


Get home delivery today!

More Local News

Slain Seattle police officer Timothy Brenton mourned by community and colleagues

Consortium on verge of owning Eastside railway land

Carnation-area woman who starved stepdaughter sentenced to more than 3 years

Ex-Boeing worker guilty of e-mail threats

Flags were key link to cop slaying, bombings

Advertising

Video

Mourners gather at KeyArena for slain officer's memorial
Mourners gathered at KeyArena for the memorial service of Seattle police Officer Timothy Brenton on November 6, 2009.

Procession for slain SPD officer
Election Night: Approve R-71
Election Night: Reject R-71
Election Night: Joe Mallahan
Election Night: Mike McGinn
Election Night: Susan Hutchison
Election Night: Dow Constatine
Candlelight vigil for Officer Brenton
Flying Elephant on Aurora

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising