Originally published May 21, 2009 at 12:00 AM | Page modified May 21, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Comments (210)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Seattle's day to tell EPA how to fix climate
Today in a meeting hall overlooking Seattle's waterfront, more than 180 people — from the governor to the mayor to high school students — will one by one tell the Obama administration how the U.S. should tackle climate change.
Seattle Times environment reporter
Climate-change hearing
The EPA will take testimony from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. today at the Bell Harbor International Conference Center, 2211 Alaskan Way, Pier 66. Only those who signed up in advance can speak.A rally in support of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions will be at noon outside the hearing site.
![]()
It's hard to overstate the significance of the moment.
Today in a meeting hall overlooking Seattle's waterfront, more than 180 people — from the governor to the mayor to several high-school students — will one by one tell the Obama administration how the U.S. should tackle climate change.
From morning until nearly sunset, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will take testimony about its plans to deem global warming a public danger.
The bureaucratic exercise masks a landmark shift in American policy: After 30 years of arguing about whether climate change is real, the federal government is on the brink of regulating the greenhouse gases that scientists say help cause it.
"We are launching into a bold new era here," said Dennis McLarren, director of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency.
"This is a very transitional period," said Robert Stavins, a Harvard professor and expert on environmental economics. "We've now begun moving down a very long road."
Today's hearing, one of just two nationwide — the other was Monday in Arlington, Va. — is a precursor to the EPA's considering new rules to cut carbon emissions.
After declaring greenhouse gases dangerous pollutants last month, the agency could move to control them under the Clean Air Act. EPA's administrator has said the agency would likely focus only on large sources, such as power plants, heavy industry and transportation.
The White House hopes congressional action makes such rules unnecessary. Democrats hope to send a bill capping greenhouse gases to the House floor next month.
Why the EPA chose Seattle for the hearing isn't clear. It declined to make anyone available to answer questions publicly.
But the Obama administration clearly knows its audience. Only a handful of those testifying are expected to oppose EPA intervention, and thousands of others, including some in salmon costumes, are expected to rally outside in support — a sight that would seem far less likely in, say, Houston.
All of that builds momentum toward action.
"In effect, the prospect of EPA regulation is a bulwark against Congress falling down on the job," said Dan Esty, a Yale University environmental professor.
President Obama wants the U.S. on the path to curb emissions 80 percent by 2050, which he has said would put the country in a better position to seek reductions from other nations during international negotiations next winter.
Ideas for reaching Obama's goals range from taxing carbon to drive down emissions to setting a cap and creating a system to trade carbon credits — the solution gaining the most favor on Capitol Hill.
No matter one's politics, few dispute that curbs on carbon seem all but certain. Around the country, "businesses are jumping on board because they see what's coming," said Todd Myers, a conservative political consultant.
The Association of Washington Business, for example, plans to urge the EPA to let Congress take the lead.
Still, what remains to be seen is how and by how much carbon emissions will be cut, and who will bear the cost.
By now the litany of threats from climate change is well-known — from rising sea levels and diminishing Northwest snowpack to the risk of new diseases and more catastrophic wildfires. A recent study led by the University of Oregon suggested the costs to Washington state of doing nothing could reach $3.8 billion a year by 2020.
But action won't be free. Regulating carbon could increase the cost of everything from driving to the store for bread to heating your home, hitting lower-income people hardest.
The increased price of goods and services accompanying a 15 percent cut in carbon-dioxide emissions could cost roughly $1,600 a year for an average household, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
"We're moving to end free and unregulated dumping of carbon into the atmosphere," said KC Golden, policy director for Seattle-based Climate Solutions, an advocacy group. "The hard questions are going to be about fairness — the distribution of costs and benefits."
Many ideas exist to address inequities, such as requiring companies that emit carbon to pay for the right to do so, with some of the money returned to consumers as a dividend.
Either way, political watchers agree, the tide has shifted toward action.
"The imperative is the cap," Golden said. "The point is to reduce the quantities of this stuff. The rest of the world has been waiting a very long time."
Craig Welch: 206-464-2093 or cwelch@seattletimes.com
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
The Fund For The Needy: Seattle Times Fund For The Needy offers opportunity to give
Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
Danny Westneat: Bonus for supe with a B minus?
Fund For The Needy donations make a difference
Nicole Brodeur: You have more to spare than you think you do

LA Galaxy's David Beckham
Los Angeles Galaxy's David Beckham talks about the upcoming MLS Cup final during after a team practice.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
- Man shot in chest on E. Union Street in Capitol Hill
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- Mariners Blog | A Mariners-Tigers swap makes a whole lot of sense for both teams
- Italian prosecutors request life sentence for UW student
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Mariners to try Dustin Ackley at second base
- Genetics anti-bias law takes effect
- Mariners Blog | Dustin Ackley to move to second base; Mariners add six to 40-man roster
- Senate vote clears hurdle
195 - First key vote today on Senate health bill
167 - Mariners add six to 40-man roster
142 - Man shot in Capitol Hill
91 - Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
88 - Italian lead prosecutor argues Knox motive was hatred
74 - Saturday links
50 - Bye week answers, volume four
49 - Prosecutor requests life in prison for Amanda Knox
49 - Historic health care bill nears key Senate vote
37
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Nonprofits get creative using Twitter and Facebook to make donation easier
- Great places to cross-country ski for free (or almost) in the Methow
- Lynnwood is reinventing itself — again
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Recipes: Sesame Pork Roast, Sour Cream Mashed Potatoes, Gingerbread with Lemon Sauce and more
- UW provost tapped for Nike's board
- 175 foster kids in Washington get 'forever families'
- BofA moves to take control of Mastro building in Fremont
- Food-bank donations pour in after theft in Rainier Valley






