Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, January 14, 2009 at 12:00 AM

Comments (0)     Print

Landowners' suit accuses BNSF of causing wildfire

Eleven property owners who live or own land near Marshall, Spokane County, have filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against BNSF Railway...

The Spokesman-Review

Eleven property owners who live or own land near Marshall, Spokane County, have filed a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against BNSF Railway for allegedly causing a 365-acre wildfire in summer 2007.

The suit, filed Tuesday in U.S. District Court, cites a state Department of Natural Resources investigation that concluded a carbon buildup in the stack of a BNSF locomotive spewed hot cinders, which started a series of fires along the railroad's right of way.

BNSF was negligent, the suit contends, because 36 similar fires caused by the railroad's locomotives broke out along the same right of way since 1970.

Several of the fires sparked on Aug. 11, 2007, merged, becoming what was called the Marshall Complex Fire, causing evacuations of homes between Marshall and Cheney.

"These fires transformed a beautiful, pristine, green, living environment into an ugly, blackened and scarred landscape of standing, but decimated trees," the suit alleges.

The fires destroyed a home, fences and other personal property. Smoke, soot and flames also damaged soils and wildlife habitat, the suit says.

Among other effects, the fires caused increased noise, erosion, clouds of dust stirred up by wind, loss of natural wind breaks, noxious weed growth and hotter temperatures due to the lack of shade, the suit claims.

It accused the railroad of violating state law by creating an "actionable nuisance" and causing an "actionable trespass" on the plaintiffs' private property.

BNSF spokesman Gus Melonas, of Seattle, had no comment on the filing of the suit.

"We do not comment on legal matters at this point," he said.

The suit, filed by Spokane attorneys Richard Eymann and Steven Jones, seeks unspecified damages for monetary losses, mental anguish and emotional distress, along with "substantial expenses" incurred by the plaintiffs.

The suit asks for a jury trial and treble damages if the panel returns a judgment favoring the plaintiffs.

Damages from the loss of trees and land restoration alone are estimated at $10.7 million by a certified arborist, the suit says.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

Print      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.

advertising


Get home delivery today!

UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case

NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife

Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River

NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising