Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Friday, December 26, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Comments (1)     E-mail article     Print view

Forest Service ready to clear way for gas pipeline

The U.S. Forest Service plans to alter its environmental standards to allow a proposed $800 million natural-gas pipeline to run through 47 miles of Mount Hood National Forest.

PORTLAND — The U.S. Forest Service plans to alter its environmental standards to allow a proposed $800 million natural-gas pipeline to run through 47 miles of Mount Hood National Forest.

The proposed Palomar pipeline would require opening a path measuring 120 feet wide. The path would stretch through forest areas that have been protected from clear-cutting and other disturbances under the department's management plans.

The Forest Service would also have to revise other rules, such as limiting cutting around Wild and Scenic Clackamas River, spotted-owl habitats and recreational areas.

The pipeline is a joint venture of Northwest Natural Gas Co. and TransCanada Corp. Construction is scheduled to start in November 2011.

If approved, it will feed into a natural-gas network east of the Cascades and extend across 217 miles.

Supporters of the project say it would provide a much-needed alternative to a natural-gas pipeline running through the Columbia River Gorge and into the Willamette Valley.

Natural gas is a resource that could ease potential petroleum shortages and provide an alternative to coal, which generates about 40 percent of the electricity used in Oregon, Palomar spokesman David Dodson said.

"We support renewable energy, but natural gas will have to be part of the mix," Dodson said.

Opponents of the project argue portions of the forest would be lost, and if a pipeline should be built at all, it should be closer aligned with existing roads.

"If this was a timber sale, it would be illegal," said Amy Harwood, program director for conservation group Bark, which advocates preserving forests surrounding Mount Hood. "Why should we allow an energy company special treatment?"

Once the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, which has authority over the project, decides whether to allow the project to proceed, the Forest Service will begin deciding the specific changes it will make to its management plans.

FERC spokeswoman Tamara Young-Allen said the agency approves most pipeline proposals, and tends to focus on requirements companies must meet to mitigate environmental damage. The agency will likely evaluate the project within the next 12 months.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
The environmental cost is worth lowering our dependence on foreign oil. I say go for it. You cannot make everyone happy.  Posted on December 26, 2008 at 10:52 AM by JakeyW. Jump to comment

advertising

Jerry Large: Issues of aging affect all

Seattle-area homebuilder losing projects to foreclosure

Trees vs. houses: Narrow, leafy street is last chance for two Madrona homes waiting to be moved

NEW - 10:28 AM
Court rules partial fence not enough for burglary

Health-plan costs soar for individuals

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising