Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, December 11, 2008 at 12:10 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail article     Print view

Equipment makers not liable in 2 asbestos lawsuits

The state Supreme Court has ruled in two asbestos cases that a manufacturer can't be held liable for failing to warn about the hazards of another manufacturer's product.

OLYMPIA, Wash. —

The state Supreme Court has ruled in two asbestos cases that a manufacturer can't be held liable for failing to warn about the hazards of another manufacturer's product.

The cases involve two men who once worked aboard Navy ships, Joseph Simonetta and Vernon Braaten.

Simonetta said his lung cancer was caused by performing maintenance on an evaporator. Braaten, who worked as a pipefitter, developed mesothelioma.

The companies sued are Griscom Russell, now Viad, and Saberhagen Holdings.

In a 6-3 ruling in both cases, the court ruled that since the defendants didn't make, sell or recommend the use of asbestos, they couldn't be held liable.

The dissent argues that the companies should be liable because asbestos was key to use of the equipment.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article. Start the conversation.

advertising

Teen is beaten in bus tunnel; Metro to review policies

School levies passing in most area districts

King County library measure ahead by slight margin

Medical pot exceeds law, but no charges

Two names dominate as Seattle begins police-chief search

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising