Originally published June 2, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 2, 2008 at 8:32 PM
Haq jury deadlocked on majority of criminal charges
Jurors weighing the fate of Naveed Haq said this afternoon they have been able to reach a unanimous verdict on only one portion of the 15 total counts facing the accused Jewish Federation gunman.
Seattle Times staff reporter
Jurors weighing the fate of Naveed Haq said they are hopelessly deadlocked on all but a portion of one of the 15 criminal charges against the accused Jewish Federation gunman.
For the second time today, jurors halted their deliberations this afternoon to send a note to trial judge Paris Kallas. In that note, jurors said they've only reached a unanimous verdict on only one portion of one count and are deadlocked on the others.
The judge ordered the jury to continue deliberations.
The possibility of a mistrial looms greater with the jury's announcement and a verdict could come as early as tomorrow. Along with earlier questions the jury has posed to the judge, it appears they are having a difficult time agreeing on Haq's sanity at the time of the shootings.
If jurors are unable to agree unanimously on one or more counts, it could lead to a mistrial and likely a retrial.
The jury has been deliberating since May 23.
Haq, 32, is accused of shooting the six women after he burst into the offices of the Jewish Federation of Greater Seattle on July 28, 2006. He is charged with one count of aggravated first-degree murder for slaying employee Pamela Waechter; five counts of attempted first-degree murder; one count of first-degree kidnapping; one count of unlawful imprisonment; one count of first-degree burglary; and six counts of violating the state's hate-crime law. He has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity.
In its note this afternoon, the jury of 12 said it remained "divided" on 14 counts and a portion of a 15th, but it didn't say on which count it had come to partial agreement.
Prosecutors argued that Kallas should require the jurors to continue deliberating. She agreed, saying that the length of the six-week trial, the complexity of much of the expert testimony — which centered on medical diagnosis, medications and mental-illness symptoms — and the number of counts warranted more than 5 ½ days of deliberation.
Defense attorney John Carpenter argued that requiring the jury to continue on would "be viewed as coercive."
"It's pretty unambiguous that they don't believe they're going to be able to reach a unanimous verdict on 14 counts," he said.
Citing case law, Kallas said trial judges "tread a narrow and dangerous course" when deciding how much time is enough for deliberations. If the jury sends another note stating they are unable to continue, she would then consider questioning them, she said.
![]()
This morning, the jury send a note to Kallas asking the trial judge for help in clarifying two key issues related to Haq's insanity plea.
Jurors are considering whether Haq was able to perceive the nature and quality of his acts, something of key importance in determining the sanity of a criminal defendant. The jury this morning asked Kallas for further definition of the words "nature" and "quality."
But Kallas declined to elaborate on the definitions already provided to jurors.
Attorneys on both sides agreed, saying the jury should be told to reread the court's instructions already provided. The judge also declined to answer the jury's second question, which was for additional guidance on how to define the terms "right" and "wrong."
Defense attorneys requested that Kallas specify to jurors that they could consider both a legal and a moral wrong. But, in agreeing with prosecutors, she declined, citing case law that states no definition of wrong and right should accompany jury instructions in an insanity defense.
To find Haq not guilty by reason of insanity, which would result in commitment to a mental hospital, the jury must find that at the time of the shootings, as a result of mental disease or defect, Haq was unable to perceive the nature and quality of the act with which he is charged; or that he was unable to tell right from wrong with reference to that act.
On Wednesday, jurors sent two questions to Kallas that indicated they were still mulling the first of 15 criminal counts against Haq on the third day of deliberations. In a note sent from the jury room, jurors asked the judge in the event they failed to reach a unanimous verdict on count one — aggravated first-degree murder or, alternately, second-degree murder — should they move on to count two, which is the first of five counts of attempted murder. Kallas agreed with prosecutors, who asked her not to give an answer.
Senior Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Don Raz argued that telling the jurors to move on to count two might give the impression that they have spent enough time considering the first count."Given the length of the trial, the complexity of the issues, it would be too early to poll them," said Kallas, referring to the juror questioning undertaken after a jury announces it has either reached an impasse or arrived at a verdict.
Jurors also asked Kallas whether they could consider the 15 counts against Haq in any order they chose. The judge said they could, telling them simply to continue their deliberations in the order they see fit.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 09:46 AM
Exxon Mobil wins ruling in Alaska oil spill case
NEW - 7:51 AM
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife
Longview man says he was tortured with hot knife
Longview mill spills bleach into Columbia River
NEW - 8:00 AM
More extensive TSA searches in Sea-Tac Airport rattle some travelers

general classifieds
Garage & estate salesFurniture & home furnishings
Electronics
just listed
***Stunning Akc POMERANIAN baby girl W/ FUL...
12 U Select Baseball Coach Wanted
1994 WIn 1901
More listings
POST A FREE LISTING
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Quick decisions: How Washington hired its new football staff
- Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looms
- Justin Wilcox's versatile defensive style is the right fit for Huskies | Jerry Brewer
- It's Terrence Time: Enigmatic Ross leads Huskies
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- Club promoter convicted in brutal 2010 murder of Des Moines prostitute
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
434 - Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looming
346 - Sheriff's office unhappy with 911 dispatcher in caseworker's call
282 - 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
235 - Source: NY, California to sign mortgage settlement
210 - Oregon live game thread
153 - Pac-12 picks ... including the UW game
140 - Lakewood cop accused of taking donations for slain officers' families
114 - Department of Justice owes the Seattle Police Department an apology
88 - Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
72
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Darren Berg gets 18-year sentence for Ponzi scheme
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- A wandering gene's destructive path | Book review
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review
- UW opening incubator facility for startups
- Controversial principal at Lowell Elementary takes job in Tacoma
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
