Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published November 8, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified November 8, 2007 at 3:16 PM

E-mail article     Print view

No liability for doctor who revived newborn

A doctor can't be held liable for resuscitating a baby who was born without a heartbeat and survived with severe disabilities, the state...

The Associated Press

A doctor can't be held liable for resuscitating a baby who was born without a heartbeat and survived with severe disabilities, the state Supreme Court says.

The baby's parents filed a malpractice lawsuit after the baby's 2004 birth. They claimed doctors in Vancouver, Wash., were negligent when they continued to resuscitate the baby for almost half an hour, after he was born without a heartbeat.

The parents also said the medical team should have gotten their consent before continuing to revive the baby.

But the Supreme Court justices say the doctor can't be held liable for failing to stop resuscitation efforts on a baby.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

Lake Union fireworks fun based on a blast from the past

Merchant Marine veterans fight for recognition

Walk the deck of a restored schooner

Lake Washington's sockeye run may hit a record low

Oxygen loss tied to sky divers' crash

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising