Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published May 10, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified May 10, 2007 at 2:46 PM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Court upholds murder conviction based on DNA from envelope

Seattle police detectives did not violate a suspected murderer's constitutional rights when they posed as lawyers and tricked him into licking...

Seattle Times staff reporter

Seattle police detectives did not violate a suspected murderer's constitutional rights when they posed as lawyers and tricked him into licking an envelope in order to obtain a sample of his DNA, the state Supreme Court has found.

The 6-3 decision, filed this morning, upholds the King County Superior Court conviction of John Nicholas Athan and could clear the way for police to use similar tactics in future investigations without worrying about the impacts on criminal prosecution.

In 2004, a jury found Athan guilty of second-degree murder in the death of 13-year-old Kristen Sumstad, whose body was found in a cardboard box behind a TV-repair shop in Magnolia in 1982. Athan was 14 at the time of the slaying. Two decades later, detectives linked Athan to the cold case using a ruse that became a controversial spark in a national debate over police versus privacy rights.

The detectives, posing as members of a fictitious law firm, invited Athan, a longtime suspect now living in New Jersey, to join a class-action lawsuit for overpaid parking tickets. After Athan licked an envelope they mailed to him and sent it back to police, his DNA was matched to a sample that had been recovered from Sumstad at the time of her death.

Athan was given a 10-year minimum sentence. His attorney fought the conviction, saying the police action to gather the crucial DNA evidence was illegal and violated Athan's state and federal constitutional rights.

"No recognized privacy interest exists in voluntarily discarded saliva," the court wrote in its ruling.

In a dissenting opinion, however, Justice Tom Chambers expressed concern over the majority opinion's potential impacts on attorney-client relations.

"Washington law prohibits a nonattorney from holding himself or herself out as an attorney," he wrote. "Permitting this unlawful and unethical conduct ... undermines the ... ability of all people to communicate freely with their attorneys without fear that the communications will be used against them."

Natalie Singer: 206-464-2704 or nsinger@seattletimes.com

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

More Local News

UPDATE - 10:48 PM
Seattle and most other school measures passing

Seattle is first U.S. stop for Picasso exhibit

UPDATE - 10:47 PM
King County library measure ahead by slight margin

NEW - 10:16 PM
Medical pot exceeds law, but no charges

Seattle physician Brian Krabak will do more than treat injuries at Winter Olympics

More Local News headlines...

advertising


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

nwautos

Fatal crashes are down in Washington, and a national used-car database goes onlinenew
Associated Press Study: Fatal crashes down in Washington Last year Washington's roads were the scene of the fewest fatal crashes since 1955. According...
Post a comment

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising