Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published February 23, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified February 23, 2007 at 10:49 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Agreement on viaduct issue: It's a mess

There is little agreement about how to replace the ailing Alaskan Way Viaduct, but speakers at a Thursday night debate agreed on one point: Everything is a big mess.

Seattle Times staff reporter

There is little agreement about how to replace the ailing Alaskan Way Viaduct, but speakers at a Thursday night debate agreed on one point: Everything is a big mess.

"We're headed for a major train wreck," said former Seattle Mayor Charles Royer, who supports replacing the viaduct with a trimmed four-lane tunnel. He asserted the debate "could end political careers."

City Council President Nick Licata, who supports rebuilding the viaduct as an elevated structure, agreed.

"This is a soap opera," he said. "Think monorail," he added, referring to the plan, eventually abandoned by voters, to build a monorail between Ballard and West Seattle.

Phil Talmadge, a former state Supreme Court justice and legislator, said he was "tired of all the political egos. We need to cut through all the nonsense."

And Jessyn Farrell, executive director of the Transportation Choices Coalition, who opposes rebuilding the viaduct, asked the audience of several hundred people: "Why are we in this dysfunctional political soup?"

Little new ground was broken in the debate, but all the speakers expressed frustration at the politics that dominate the issue.

Voters will face two measures on the March 13 ballot and can choose yes or no votes on each. They will be asked whether they want to replace the viaduct with a four-lane tunnel and whether they want to rebuild it as another elevated structure. The vote is advisory only; to Gov. Christine Gregoire and state lawmakers who want to build another elevated viaduct, the vote may be meaningless.

Farrell drew the loudest laughs when she talked about how ugly she believes a replaced viaduct would be. "How do you put lipstick on a pig? It's still a pig," she said.

The forum was sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Washington and The Seattle Times.

In other developments Thursday, Seattle Transportation Department director Grace Crunican sent a letter to Doug MacDonald, head of the state Department of Transportation, complaining about an unreleased report done for the state that said the city's tunnel plan could handle the expected traffic.

"As a result, the governor, the Legislature and the voters of the city of Seattle have been badly misinformed," she said.

Susan Gilmore: 206-464-2054 or sgilmore@seattletimes.com

Copyright © The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

Chase won't pay for Seattle's Lake Union fireworks next year

Group hopes to build 75-megawatt solar park near Cle Elum

Stalled Bellevue tower site won't be eyesore

The end of the line, for now: Tukwila is the jewel in the crown of Link

Regional vendors vying for veterinarians' attention at convention

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising