Originally published Thursday, January 11, 2007 at 12:00 AM
State gains steam in union case before high court
Justices appear to side with Washington against using union nonmembers' fees for politics.
McClatchy Newspapers
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court appeared ready Wednesday to reject claims that the First Amendment prohibits Washington state from forcing unions to get permission before spending some of the money they collect on political causes.
At issue is how the Washington Education Association (WEA), the state's largest teachers union, handles the so-called agency fees it collects from school employees who choose not to be union members. Those fees, under state law, are paid to cover collective-bargaining activity that benefits everyone, whether they are union members or not.
But a 1992 law prohibited unions in the state from using that money for political activity without first getting permission from the nonmembers.
The arguments Wednesday turned largely on whose First Amendment rights were at stake. Lawyers for the state, backed by the Bush administration, argued that the most important rights in the case belong to employees, who shouldn't be forced to support causes with which they disagree.
Lawyers for the union say its rights to lobby are being infringed by the Washington restrictions.
The Supreme Court already has said nonmembers must be able to "opt out" of paying for political activity; the Washington law went further, saying unions must get them to "opt in" before pursuing political causes with their money.
Both the state attorney general and several teachers sued the WEA, accusing it of violating the 1992 law. The state's highest court concluded that the law violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, essentially because it placed undue burdens on the unions' political speech.
The state court agreed that the "opt-in" requirement would create an administrative nightmare for the union in its effort to collect the fees, and that the "opt-out" requirement was a less burdensome alternative that the state should have chosen.
That reasoning clearly fell flat with Chief Justice John Roberts and with justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito.
Justices John Paul Stevens, David Souter and Ruth Bader Ginsburg also hammered the union's lawyer with questions that reflected serious doubt about his arguments.
Justice Stephen Breyer seemed similarly inclined, but less certain. Justice Clarence Thomas, as is his custom, said nothing during arguments.
Kennedy best summed the justices' response to the union's arguments:
"States have considerable discretion in determining how to protect federal constitutional rights," he said at one point. "It seems to me that Washington acted quite properly in saying we will use this mechanism in order to protect our workers' First Amendment constitutional rights."
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
UPDATE - 03:39 PM
Arson suspect has long history of setting fires
Band of advocates, activists now McGinn's likely insiders
Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
Kirkland annex 'yes' could be slipping away
UPDATE - 03:57 PM
Kent man challenges Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels' gun ban

Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Skiers crowded the slopes at Crystal Mountain for one of the resort's earliest openings.
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- Homeless man, 46, arrested in Greenwood arsons
- KVI talk radio host off the air as of Thursday
- Steve Kelley | ESPN's Bill Simmons gets us: He hates Clay Bennett, too
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
- Seattle U. Men's Hoops | Big recruit goes from Huskies to Redhawks
- Mariners sign Jack Wilson to 2-year contract
- Razor found in muffin an accident, 'mortified' baker says
- Suspect's family shaken by slaying of police officer
- Mountlake Terrace woman reports razor in muffin
- Man says he will protest city's gun ban by carrying gun into community center
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
635 - OSU game thread
622 - Seattle man to pack a pistol into community center to protest mayor's ban
356 - GOP clueless as families struggle with health care
196 - NYC trial for 9/11 suspects poses risks
132 - Band of advocates, activists now McGinn's likely insiders
98 - Wright State game thread
97 - Licata looks at boosting traffic-ticket revenue
87 - Kent man challenges Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels' gun ban
79 - Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
70
- Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
- Homeless man, 46, arrested in Greenwood arsons
- Ivar's undersea billboards a hoax devised as marketing ploy
- Light rail to airport to begin Dec. 19
- Steve Kelley | ESPN's Bill Simmons gets us: He hates Clay Bennett, too
- An 802.11n upgrade could make a big difference
- KVI talk radio host off the air as of Thursday
- Washington in race for federal education funds
- Police investigate videotaped arrest
- Goodwill's Glitter Sale is Nov. 14-15





