Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Local News


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published January 10, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified January 10, 2007 at 4:16 PM

E-mail article     Print view

U.S. Supreme Court hears Washington union-fee case

The narrow issue before the justices is whether, as Washington law prescribed, employees must opt in, or affirmatively consent, to having some of their money used in election campaigns.

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices indicated today they are inclined to uphold a Washington state law preventing unions from using fees they get from workers for political activities.

The case involves a few thousand teachers and other education employees who are in the bargaining unit and thus represented by the more than 70,000-member Washington Education Association — but who have chosen not to join the union.

Workers can't be forced to join or pay for the union's political activism, but they can be charged a fee for labor negotiations that affect them.

The narrow issue before the justices is whether, as Washington law prescribed, employees must opt in, or affirmatively consent, to having some of their money used in election campaigns.

The Washington Supreme Court struck down the law, saying the union's offer to reduce fees for any nonmember who registers an objection to the political spending was sufficient.

"States have considerable discretion in determining how to protect First Amendment constitutional rights. It seems to me Washington acted quite properly," Justice Anthony Kennedy said, reflecting a view seemingly shared by at least five other justices.

The provision was a small part of a comprehensive campaign finance reform law that Washington voters approved in 1992.

Washington Attorney General Robert McKenna said there's no reason to think workers who decide not to join the union would want to support its political activities. "They shouldn't be required to say no twice," McKenna said.

In practice, the union uses the money only for ballot initiatives, not for candidate elections. Campaign contributions to union-backed candidates come from a separate political action committee.

John West, representing the union, said workers rights already are protected because they can object to their money being spent on politics.

The union is the state's largest teachers union, representing teachers and other employees of public schools and colleges. Less than 5 percent of employees the union represents choose not to be members, the union said.

The cases are Davenport v. Washington Education Association, 05-1589, and Washington v. Washington Education Association, 05-1657.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

More Local News headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

advertising

UPDATE - 12:32 PM
DNA, ballistics tie man to cop killing, police say

NEW - 12:49 PM
Alaska Air Group believes smaller is better, CEO tells investors

Greenwood merchants nervous after 3 more arsons

UW to honor war heroes with Medal of Honor memorial

NEW - 11:14 AM
Conte pleads guilty in racketeering case

Advertising

Video

Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Ken Auletta talks about Google with Brier Dudley at the Seattle Central Library.

Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center
Pelosi speaks at Swedish Medical Center
"Pistol" Pete Ryan
Mourners gather at KeyArena for slain officer's memorial
Procession for slain SPD officer
Election Night: Approve R-71
Election Night: Reject R-71
Election Night: Joe Mallahan

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising