| Traffic | Weather | Your account | Movies | Restaurants | Today's events |
|
|
Monday, January 10, 2005 - Page updated at 07:30 P.M. Information in this article, originally published January 9, was corrected January 10. A previous version of this story needed clarification. In an article Sunday on redrawing the boundaries of the King County Council districts, Shoreline City Councilwoman Maggie Fimia's position was misstated. While Fimia said the proposed map is a step in the right direction, she says it doesn't go far enough. She supports an alternative map that would adjust the boundaries to create more swing districts and better represent communities with common interests. Districting Committee presents draft map Seattle Times staff reporter The five-person committee charged with redrawing Metropolitan King County Council District boundaries presented the fruit of their labors, a single new draft map, to an overflowing crowd in Seattle yesterday. The map, which reduces the number of council districts from 13 to nine in accordance with a charter amendment approved by voters in November, was met with mixed reaction. Several speakers acknowledged that while consensus may be impossible, Proposal X, as the new map was labeled, was an acceptable compromise. "I think we're getting close to as perfect a map as possible," said Shoreline City Councilwoman Maggie Fimia. The final proposal did address concerns raised in previous public hearings. Mercer Island now falls in an Eastside district; Auburn and Federal Way share a district; Kirkland and unincorporated areas to the north are included in the same district; and the northern cities of Woodinville, Bothell and Kenmore are grouped together. But the draft map did not do enough to satisfy concerns of some rural residents, many of whom had backed Republican proposals that would have split the rural areas into three districts. The new map puts them into two districts.
"There's a lot of folks that are unhappy that we're going to be stuck with this," said Robert Larsen of Carnation. "We believe we are not being represented."
"Don't dilute our voice," said James Kelly, president of the Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle. "We need to be represented just like other communities are represented." The five-member panel that created the map faced a difficult task, nonpartisan chairman Steve Ohlenkamp said. Not only were there severe time constraints — the panel had a little over two months to complete the proposal — but each district had to contain roughly 193,000 people, be "compact and contiguous," and reflect political boundaries, school-district boundaries and natural boundaries such as rivers and roads. "I think we've reached a reasonable balance," Ohlenkamp said. "It's been quite a challenge, but I think we've done a fair job of meeting that challenge." Adjustments still possible The committee might still make some minor adjustments to the proposal before it is filed with the county clerk Saturday, Ohlenkamp said.
Districting Committee member Skip Rowley, a Republican, agreed that the proposal might be modified, but declined to offer specifics. Rowley, echoing the views of a number of speakers at yesterday's hearing, said downsizing the council was a mistake. Regardless of how the final district map looks, he said, "there are going to be people who are going to be underrepresented." Jessica Blanchard: 206-464-3896
Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company
|
|