Advertising
anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES





Thursday, September 09, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Oregon labor official opposes gay-marriage-ban measure

By SARAH LINN
The Associated Press

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
Most read articles Most read articles
Most e-mailed articles Most e-mailed articles
PORTLAND — A proposed ban on same-sex marriage would mean unfair and unequal treatment for gay workers and their families, Oregon Labor Commissioner Dan Gardner said yesterday.

Gardner joined about a dozen members of building and trade unions to oppose Measure 36, which would amend the Oregon Constitution to define marriage as being between a man and a woman.

If approved by voters Nov. 2, the measure would eliminate health insurance and other benefits for the spouses and children of married gay and lesbian workers.

"It literally puts unequal treatment, unfairness, in the law," Gardner said of the measure, sponsored by the Defense of Marriage Coalition. "Is that what the constitution is about? I don't think so."

But Tim Nashif, political director for the Portland-based coalition, said Measure 36 can't take away benefits that don't exist.

"If someone wants to extend insurance to gay or lesbian partners, they don't need permission and they don't need a law," Nashif said. "It has nothing to do with marriage."

Without the protection of marriage, the domestic partners of gay or lesbian workers would be unable to receive the wages of their deceased spouses or file wrongful-death lawsuits, Gardner said.

They also wouldn't receive health insurance or medical coverage under some plans.

"Clearly, being married matters," said electrical apprentice Dolores Doyle, who married her partner of 16 years, Kelly Burke, in Multnomah County on March 3.

Since then, Burke has received medical coverage under her spouse's union contract, Doyle said, bringing emotional and financial stability to the couple and their 3-year-old son, Avery.

"All working people should be treated fairly and equally and be able to share the benefit of that labor with their spouses and families," Gardner said, noting that most Oregon businesses and unions do not count domestic partners as valid spouses.
 
advertising
Nashif said benefits for the families of gay spouses should be decided by the courts or the Legislature, not Gardner.

"I think it's very unfortunate that the labor commissioner of Oregon would use his office to promote the gay agenda," he said.

Gardner's announcement came one day after a judge struck down Washington's ban on same-sex marriage, saying that state's constitution broadly guarantees equality.

Thurston County Superior Court Judge Richard Hicks said those guarantees of equality are violated by the state's 1998 Defense of Marriage Act, which bars same-sex civil marriage.

The American Civil Liberties Union brought the case on behalf of 11 gay and lesbian couples from Washington. It, along with a similar ruling in King County, will be appealed to the state Supreme Court.

The Oregon Supreme Court is slated for its own challenge on Nov. 17. Nine same-sex couples allege that prohibiting them from marrying denies them equal protection under the Oregon Constitution.

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive

More local news headlines...

 LOCAL NEWS SEARCH
Today Archive

Advanced search

 
advertising

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top