Advertising
anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES






Friday, June 25, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Sound Transit told to forget monorail

By Eric Pryne
Seattle Times staff reporter

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
Most read articles Most read articles
Most e-mailed articles Most e-mailed articles
When and if it expands, Sound Transit should stick with light rail, commuter rail and buses, and forget about monorail, the agency's planners said yesterday.

"We want to focus on the three lines of business we started and make them even better," said Paul Matsuoka, Sound Transit's policy and planning officer.

Sound Transit has just started exploring the possibility of submitting a "Phase Two" package of transit improvements to voters that would build on the "Sound Move" plan approved in 1996. A draft study won't be out until fall; the Sound Transit board won't decide what to include in the new package until next spring at the earliest.

The planners' recommendation that monorail be dropped from consideration now sets up the first big decision in that planning process. About one-third of the comments Sound Transit has received so far have urged the agency to study monorail as an option.

Cleve Stockmeyer, a member of the Seattle Monorail Project board and chairman of Citizens for King County Monorail, said taking monorail off the table now would be premature.

"We're not saying, 'Do monorail.' We're just saying, 'Study it,' " Stockmeyer said.

The Sound Transit board could make a decision July 8.

Monorail has advantages, Matsuoka told the board yesterday.

But grafting monorail onto existing light rail or commuter rail lines could force riders to make transfers that wouldn't be necessary if those lines were simply extended, he said. "Should you be changing technologies in the middle of the corridor?"

Monorail also would be incompatible with some decisions state and regional officials have made about high-capacity transit, Matsuoka added. Officials already have chosen "bus rapid transit" for I-405, for instance.

Transportation consultants Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas also recommended against further study of a monorail in a report to Sound Transit this month. It's generally not as cheap or as flexible as buses or light rail, which can be built on the surface, the report said. Those points are valid, Stockmeyer said, "but if congestion is the problem, then speed of travel is the answer. ... People know monorails don't get stuck in traffic."
 
advertising
Eric Pryne: 206-464-2231 or epryne@seattletimes.com

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive

More local news headlines...

 LOCAL NEWS SEARCH
Today Archive

Advanced search

 
advertising

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top