Originally published Monday, June 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Postnuptial agreements help resolve issues long after "I do"
A friend telephones me with the news: She and her husband are back together. Both are academics, and they've had a rocky few years. She came to Washington...
Special to The Seattle Times
A friend telephones me with the news: She and her husband are back together. Both are academics, and they've had a rocky few years. She came to Washington, D.C., to pursue a dream of working on health-care policy. He was left in his university town. Her one-year fellowship turned into a five-year sabbatical. A commuter marriage, she said. Abandonment, he said. They were inching toward the edge of the divorce cliff.
Now they are starting over. They've settled their arguments over money. They've divided up some of their assets. They are maintaining two households but agree to try to spend no more than 10 days apart in a month. They are about to celebrate their 40th wedding anniversary. "Deep down we really do love each other," she says. "If you once loved in a passionate way, you can reclaim that."
The news is the tool this 60-something couple used to reclaim their marriage: the postnuptial agreement.
The postnup is a contract signed during marriage to manage financial affairs and divide income and assets in the event of death or divorce. Unheard of 25 years ago, this midmarriage document is gaining a foothold in American matrimonial culture. It was even featured on the television program "Boston Legal." In a recent survey of members of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 49 percent said they had seen an increase in postnuptial agreements in the past five years.
Like its better-known cousin, the prenuptial agreement, the postnup is responding to two demographic trends: the overall aging of the population and the increasingly common pattern of marriage, divorce and remarriage along with its complicated legacy of children from different relationships.
One purpose of the postnup is estate planning. "That is a perfectly good reason to do it," says Jeff Atkinson, principal author of "The American Bar Association Guide to Marriage, Divorce & Families" (Random House, 2006). It is a way to direct retirement benefits to children of a previous marriage, or to an adult child with special needs. Or to make sure a beloved summer cabin stays in the family by making it separate from the couple's community property.
For my friends, the postnup removed money as an issue and allowed them to focus on their relationship.
To be sure, many couples fight about money — one is a spendthrift, the other a saver. He buys a new car without consulting her. She resents the money going to college tuition for his children. And in late-life marriages, what's fair when one spouse earns more money than the other? A postnup can give couples predictability and a sense of security about their financial future.
But using a postnup to heal a troubled marriage is controversial.
"There are cases where that's advisable," says Gregg Herman, a family-law attorney in Milwaukee. "But I only recommend it where there is an equal desire to stay married and work on the marriage." These are committed couples with "soft" problems of incompatibility, from struggling with retirement issues to coping with boredom. "Counseling and joint therapy are critical to these people," Herman says.
The postnup is not recommended for couples who are confronting the "hard" problems: physical or mental abuse, infidelity, substance abuse. Nor for people who are really planning to break up and want to use the postnup as a Trojan-horse settlement in any future divorce battle.
Partners are rarely in the same place in a troubled relationship, and one spouse is often more committed to the marriage. The temptation is to use the postnup as leverage to change behavior.
![]()
For example, if one has a drinking problem or has had an affair but wants to preserve the marriage, the other makes staying together conditional on signing an agreement that says in effect: If you slip up again, you give up your rights — you have to pay me a lot of money in support, and I get the house, too! This kind of postnup is really an ultimatum. Money becomes the glue of the marriage. As Herman says: "Money is rarely a good bond for keeping people together."
States vary in how they view the legality of postnup agreements. Spouses must fully disclose their income, assets and debts. They should each have legal representation — and plenty of time to think about the terms so that neither is pressured to sign. And most important, the agreement has to be fair to both. Postnups are held to a very high standard of fairness in financial matters, lawyers say, perhaps an even higher standard than prenups.
These agreements are not about love. They can help couples deal with financial issues. But by itself, a postnup cannot save a marriage.
This story originally appeared
in The Washington Post.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
On the left hand, answers aren't easy
UPDATE - 09:35 AM
Late Mardi Gras meets spring break for rowdy fete
UPDATE - 09:39 AM
Kate vs. Catherine; the Royal name dilemma
Prince William, Kate Middleton visit Belfast

general classifieds
Garage & estate salesFurniture & home furnishings
Electronics
just listed
13 Unit Brick
Adorable Bull Terrier puppies for good home...
AKC Great Dane Puppies Ready
More listings
POST A FREE LISTING
- Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Washington men walloped by Oregon, 82-57
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Quick decisions: How Washington hired its new football staff
- Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looms
- Justin Wilcox's versatile defensive style is the right fit for Huskies | Jerry Brewer
- Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
508 - Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
417 - AP Source: Obama to change birth control rule
415 - Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
381 - Rough road again
109 - A few late-night notes
98 - USA Today further spells out how Mariners, handful of clubs next in line for huge cash windfall
76 - Marijuana legalization initiative set to go on Nov. ballot
76 - UW throttled at Oregon
68 - New TV deals won't guarantee everlasting success; that part will still take work by Mariners and others
56
- Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Economy, blogs give survivalists new reason to look to Northwest
- Bellevue College adds a third bachelor's degree program
- State's share of mortgage settlement: $648 million
- Darren Berg gets 18-year sentence for Ponzi scheme
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review



