Originally published July 1, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified July 1, 2007 at 2:01 AM
EcoConsumer
Does your makeup need a nontoxic makeover?
When your personal-care products could cause cancer, that's a little too personal. Most of us use 15 or more cosmetic and toiletry products each day...
Special to The Seattle Times
Skin Deep cosmetics database: www.cosmeticdatabase.com
Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: www.toxicfreelegacy.org
Campaign for Safe Cosmetics: www.safecosmetics.org
Cosmetic, Toiletry & Fragrance Association: www.ctfa.org
When your personal-care products could cause cancer, that's a little too personal.
Most of us use 15 or more cosmetic and toiletry products each day, such as shampoo, skin cream, deodorant, sunscreen, nail polish and perfume. The personal-care products used by Americans contain 10,500 different chemicals, according to the Seattle-based Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition.
Only 11 percent of these chemicals have been assessed for health and safety by any U.S. government agency, says the coalition, and one-third of all personal-care products contain at least one chemical linked to cancer. Some chemicals in these products also have links to birth defects and other health problems.
Chemicals in cosmetics that pose health risks, according to the Coalition, include suspected and proven carcinogens such as formaldehyde and coal tar, phthalates (alleged endocrine disrupters) and neurotoxins such as lead and mercury.
Many problem ingredients do not appear on labels. Under current federal law, the cosmetics industry largely regulates itself. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does not require cosmetics manufacturers to have their products pre-approved before they are sold, to report cosmetics-related injuries or to file data on ingredients.
The Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, a major industry trade group, insists that concerns over health risks are unwarranted, stating, "FDA statistics confirm that cosmetics are one of the safest categories of products used by Americans today."
Check your makeup
Several encouraging developments have occurred recently. An online cosmetics-safety database for consumers, called "Skin Deep," underwent a major makeover in May. This update made it more comprehensive and easier to use.
Highlighting ingredients that may pose safety risks, this ambitious database maintained by the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG) lists ingredients in 25,000 products. That's still only one-quarter of the personal-care products on the market. But you will probably find data about several products you use. It might even inspire your own cosmetics-purchasing makeover.
Europe REACHes out
In the European Union, a new law known as REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) created the European Chemicals Agency on June 1. The law requires companies to register product-safety information with the agency, and will likely result in new bans of chemicals.
Even before REACH, Europe had already banned more than 1,000 ingredients in cosmetics, compared with just eight cosmetic ingredients outlawed in the U.S., according to Consumers Union.
Some cosmetics companies market different versions of products, with the U.S. versions containing chemicals not allowed in the E.U. But as this becomes more difficult for manufacturers, both logistically and from a public-relations standpoint, more companies will likely remove targeted chemicals from their American products.
U.S. laws to become stronger?
Congress may soon consider making U.S. chemical regulations stronger, in response to Europe's REACH. Activity has already begun on the state level. The California Safe Cosmetics Act of 2005 requires, among other provisions, that manufacturers report the use of potentially unsafe ingredients.
A similar bill in Washington state did not make it out of committee this year. The Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition expects related legislation will be reintroduced in Olympia in 2008.
The cosmetics industry has responded to the increased scrutiny of its products by developing a Consumer Commitment Code and emphasizing the role of its Cosmetic Ingredient Review program.
What you can do
To reduce the likelihood of risks from your personal-care products, consult the "Skin Deep" database and follow these additional tips:
• Use caution with problem products. The EWG has identified hair dye, nail polish, "sunless tanning" products, "anti-aging" potions and skin lighteners as product categories with significant potential problems.
• Reduce use of fragrances. Manufacturers rarely disclose fragrance ingredients. Fragrances may contain neurotoxins and trigger allergies, says the EWG. Even products marketed as "unscented" often include a masking fragrance to cover chemical odors.
• Be skeptical of product claims. Cosmetics manufacturers don't have to verify terms such as "natural" or "organic."
• Keep it simple. In general, the fewer ingredients, the lower the risk.
Tom Watson writes the EcoConsumer column for digs on Saturdays. He is project manager for King County's Recycling and Environmental Services. Reach him at tom.watson@metrokc.gov or 206-296-4481. Watch for more EcoConsumer resources from King County at www.KCecoconsumer.com.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
Rules to dine by when eating in restaurants with kids
Washington businesses break ties to industrial-food chain
This holiday gift list lets your conscience be your guide
Northwest Living: On Whidbey, a unified home from multiple recycled parts
Plant Life: Good soil is the secret to successful gardening

PNW Magazine | Easy As Pie
A little friendly competition between professional pie-baker Kate McDermott and The Seatttle Times' Kathleen Triesch Saul is handled with great taste.
nwautos
Local riders say they've seen a surge in scooter interest in recent years, mostly from people wanting another commuting option. Seattle now ranks as o...
Post a comment
nwjobs
Post a comment
Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Do you suffer from "sitting disease"?
Post a comment
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Tugboat sinks at Seattle waterfront pier
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Woman stabbed by stranger in North Seattle
- Snow piles up on Cascade slopes
- Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
- Illegal workers quietly let go
396 - Climate change speeds up since 1997 Kyoto accord
213 - Metro won't cut bus service after all
160 - New Husky recruit: Enes Kanter
102 - Tattoos at Mill Creek Church pierce skin, soul
85 - Middleton says Huskies "plan on scoring at least 50 points'' Saturday
84 - Jerry Brewer: Seahawks can't lean on the Hutch Crutch now
75 - Bellevue residents blast new bikini espresso stand
71 - Seattle woman charged with knife attack on boyfriend's ex
71 - UW, WSU once again meet to see who's worse
68
- Sprouts, raw fish on attorney's 'do not eat' list
- Tattoos at Mill Creek church pierce skin, soul
- Food-safety lawyer's wish: Put me out of business
- Illegal workers quietly let go
- Architects, chefs find 'kid' within to build Gingerbread Village
- Rediscovering Moab, 'the most beautiful place on Earth'
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Taste | The Great Pie Bake-off pits friends and fruit





