Thursday, December 20, 2007 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
Jerry Large
The body politic's shifty mind
Seattle Times staff columnist
![]() |
This year, science is really stepping into the political arena.
Researchers are trying to get a bead on what is happening inside voters' heads. It should prove interesting. Heck, I'd like to see them analyze the candidates, too. There's a growing amount of research supporting the idea that many decisions are made in our subconscious before we are aware anything is going on.
The Seattle Times carried a story last week about several companies putting this brain science to work figuring out what voters are thinking.
It's called neuromarketing, and businesses also are starting to use it to understand customers.
One company, EmSense, measured brain waves and other physical responses to debates, commercials and speeches.
They were able to tell what caused voters to light up.
We don't always recognize what our subconscious is up to, but if you ask us questions we usually know what we are supposed to say. Peeking at our gray matter might yield a more accurate answer than asking voters or consumers to fill out a questionnaire.
That is particularly true when conflicting feelings and values are involved.
You've heard about the disparity that happens with black candidates. Pre-election polls will show a certain level of support, but the numbers are nearly always lower after voters cast their ballots.
Well, a couple of professors at the University of Washington have devised a test that might give candidates a clearer idea what they are dealing with because it bypasses voters' mouths and gets into their heads.
The findings they announced Tuesday suggest polls overestimate support for Barack Obama and underestimate support for Hillary Clinton.
They asked voters whom they planned to vote for, and 42 percent said Obama, versus 34 percent who chose Clinton.
![]()
Then the volunteers took a version of the Implicit Association Test, which requires rapid responses to words or images on a computer screen.
The IAT, which was developed by University of Washington psychology Professor Anthony Greenwald, has a proven record for measuring unconscious bias. The idea is that you make selections before your conscious self has time to screen your deeper feelings.
Clinton came out ahead with 48 percent to Obama's 25 percent.
Greenwald said that in previous elections, what people said and what the test showed them feeling were closely matched. So this year stands out.
And, he said, the drop-off in support for Obama held for blacks as well as whites and women as well as men.
The results don't mean those whose words didn't match their feelings won't vote for Obama, but it does suggest they'll have to overcome some internal hurdles to do it.
(You can take the test, or a corresponding test for the Republican race, at https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/demo/featuredtask.html.)
This is good information for the campaign organizations, but next time, I want someone to put the candidates in a lab. I want to know what's really going on in their heads.
Jerry Large's column appears Monday and Thursday. Reach him at 206-464-3346 or jlarge@seattletimes.com.
Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company
Jerry Large: Don't need cape to be a crusader
Jerry Large: Each story is shaped by all of us
Jerry Large: Past still calls to us at museum
Jerry Large: Father-son bonding: Priceless
Jerry Large: Paper, plastic, and drama

Finding your work/life balance
Author Michelle Goodman serves up fresh tips & trends in the NWjobs.com Nine to Thrive blog.
- Grand Coulee Dam's immensity dominates Columbia River Basin | Only in Washington
- Some scented household products contain chemicals classified as toxic, UW study finds
- Privacy vs. border security: Critics say laptop searches cross the line
- Toll on new 520 bridge could be $6.85 round trip, state study says
- Search suspended for young girl distress caller
- Teen dead of apparent overdose | Local Digest
- They call this tax restraint? | Danny Westneat
- Water ride has patrons flashing while splashing
- Southcenter mall expands, regroups with new retailers
- Gates Foundation breaks ground
- Some scented household products contain chemicals classified as toxic, UW study finds
- Grand Coulee Dam's immensity dominates Columbia River Basin | Only in Washington
- Making the most of your produce
- Gates Foundation breaks ground
- Privacy vs. border security: Critics say laptop searches cross the line
- Council panel OKs bag fees
- Southcenter mall expands, regroups with new retailers
- Toll on new 520 bridge could be $6.85 round trip, state study says
- Ailing WaMu says it's making headway
- Look to legumes for protein that's affordable and delicious

