Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Huskies


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Husky Football Blog

Times reporter Bob Condotta keeps the news coming about the Montlake Dawgs.

Blog Home | E-mail Bob| RSS feeds Subscribe | Twitter feed | Husky Football forum

November 16, 2009 at 9:43 AM

Comments (68)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Can this season rank as one of UW's biggest improvements ever?

Posted by Bob Condotta

For my story for today's paper, I wrote about what is left for the Huskies after Saturday's loss at Oregon State.

And among the carrots still left is to put this season in a category to be regarded as one of the biggest single-season improvements in UW history.

In fact, with two more wins, UW would finish 5-7 after having gone 0-12 last year. That would obviously be five more wins than last season, the biggest improvement since 1970 when the Huskies went 6-4 in the first year with Sonny Sixkiller at QB after going 1-9 in 1969.

The biggest improvement since then came in 2000, when Rick Neuheisel and Marques Tuiasosopo led the Huskies to the Rose Bowl and an 11-1 record a year after going 7-5, or a four-game improvement. This UW team can match that one by winning one of the last two.

One season that technically reads better than the 2000 season is 1977, when UW is listed with a 10-2 record, having gone to the Rose Bowl in the third year under Don James, a year after going 5-6. However, UW went 8-4 on the field that season, later having losses against Mississippi State and UCLA rules as forfeit wins.

As mentioned in the story, the biggest single-season leap came in 1959 when the memorable third team for Jim Owens went 10-1 and won the Rose Bowl a year after finishing 3-7, a leap of 6.5 games.

So the question for Husky fans will be whether a 5-7 season, which again would go down as the biggest single-season improvement in 39 years, would be satisfying in any way, or just that add to the disappointment considering all the earlier games that got away.

PROGRAMMING NOTE --- We'll have more later today from Steve Sarkisian's regular Monday press conference. However, since this is a bye week, there won' t be a depth chart or some of the other usual trappings of a game week.


E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

With me defending the Dawgs and you guys worrying about the AC, we may have really entered an alternate universe. But let me just say that there is...  Posted on November 16, 2009 at 10:50 AM by oldcrimson. Jump to comment
I just remember sitting in the end zone last year and watching the play to Karstetter develop and thinking to myself what in the H**** are Q-Rich...  Posted on November 16, 2009 at 10:44 AM by RIP TY. Jump to comment
********** "1) WSU- they go up. I don't think the can get any worse. They have a good young QB now. Maybe they get better line play...  Posted on November 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM by swseattleboy. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Feb 9, 10 - 8:02 PM
Tuesday night notes --- not great news on the Husky Stadium front; plus, I'm off to the Olympics

Feb 9, 10 - 12:13 PM
Pac-10 expansion to get consideration over next year

Feb 9, 10 - 10:15 AM
Bill that could help fund Husky Stadium in Executive Session today

Feb 8, 10 - 4:50 PM
Rivals names Martin one of Pac-10's best recruiters

Feb 8, 10 - 2:03 PM
Monday afternoon notes, links

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009