Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Huskies


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Husky Football Blog

Times reporter Bob Condotta keeps the news coming about the Montlake Dawgs.

Blog Home | E-mail Bob| RSS feeds Subscribe | Twitter feed | Husky Football forum

July 28, 2009 at 8:14 PM

Comments (93)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Picking the Pac

Posted by Bob Condotta

The most newsworthy thing that comes out of Pac-10 media day, which is Thursday, is usually the unveiling of the annual media poll.

While there are lots of other pre-season picks out there, the Pac-10 poll tends to serve as the "official'' one that everyone recalls later.

Here's the ballot I sent in:

1, USC
2, Cal
3, Oregon
4, Oregon State
5, Arizona State
6, Arizona
7, Stanford
8, UCLA
9, Washington
10, Washington State

I know I'll probably get some criticism for this looking a little too much like the conventional wisdom, especially at the top and bottom.

Spots 4-8, however, have shown some variance, and I found those as hard to pick as everybody else.

UCLA at No. 8 could really come back to bite me. But I like ASU's defense and schedule; I think Arizona still has a lot of pieces in place despite losing some headline acts from last year; and I really debated picking Stanford a lot higher as I think the Cardinal may be about to turn a corner.

As for the top, I'd love to find a legitimate reason to pick against USC, not because I have anything against the Trojans but just to spice things up a bit. But I just can't do it. While USC has inexperience at QB and more defensive starters to replace than usual, I think a standout O-line will make up for the former, and that the Trojans will again simply reload on D. DE Everson Griffin isn't a returning starter, but could be the best at his position in the conference by the end of the season, for instance.

I like Cal over Oregon due in part to a veteran O-line that could give the Bears the best running attack in the Pac-10.

As for the Huskies, I know some of you will ask why I couldn't think outside the box a little and find a way to move them up. But there's just too many question marks right now to objectively pick them any higher --- not to mention that this team simply needs to learn how to win again. It's college football, so little surprises anymore, and I wouldn't be floored if the Huskies finished higher. But right now, the teams above them just have more proven talent.

If you're still reading, I'd like to do again what we did here last year --- let all of you put in your selections in the comments section of this entry. I'll tally them up in a few days and compare how you guys picked it against those of us in the media.



Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

1. USC (Too much talent but not expereinced enough - players or OC/DC to contend for NC game) 2. CAL (Always a bridesmaid ...) 3. OSU (Always...  Posted on July 29, 2009 at 9:44 AM by HarryDub. Jump to comment
Until we prove we can win a single game, AND beat WSU, we belong absolutely in dead last place. WSU has beaten us 4 of the last 5 years......how...  Posted on July 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM by huskiefan. Jump to comment
1. USC 2. OSU 3. UCLA 4. Stanford 5. Cal 6. Washington 7. ASU 8. Oregon 9. Arizona 10. Bellevue H.S. 11. Wazzu  Posted on July 28, 2009 at 10:44 PM by SeaDonkey. Jump to comment

Recent entries

Feb 9, 10 - 8:02 PM
Tuesday night notes --- not great news on the Husky Stadium front; plus, I'm off to the Olympics

Feb 9, 10 - 12:13 PM
Pac-10 expansion to get consideration over next year

Feb 9, 10 - 10:15 AM
Bill that could help fund Husky Stadium in Executive Session today

Feb 8, 10 - 4:50 PM
Rivals names Martin one of Pac-10's best recruiters

Feb 8, 10 - 2:03 PM
Monday afternoon notes, links

Advertising

Advertising

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising

Browse the archives

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009