Originally published November 8, 2009 at 12:11 AM | Page modified November 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print
Share
Dems get past abortion hurdle
In a last-minute compromise to build a majority in the House, Democratic leaders agreed to new language on abortion that advocates say offers stronger guarantees that federal money will not be used for abortions and that critics say goes beyond upholding current law.
Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — In a last-minute compromise to build a majority in the House, Democratic leaders agreed to new language on abortion that advocates say offers stronger guarantees that federal money will not be used for abortions and that critics say goes beyond upholding current law.
A longtime ban on federal funding of abortions has so far applied mostly to patients on Medicaid and to workers who receive health benefits through the federal government. Insurance policies sold to others have been free to offer abortion coverage, and many do.
The present ban contains exceptions for rape and incest or when the life of the mother is at stake.
The battle in the House focused on what rules would apply under heath-care overhaul. The Democrats' original bill would have allowed people getting federal subsidies to pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Abortion opponents dismissed that as an accounting gimmick.
A key component of the bills pending in Congress would provide federal subsidies to low- and middle-income Americans to help them buy insurance policies that meet minimum benefits standards set by the government. Millions of people would qualify for the subsidies, which would pay a significant portion of the premium.
In an effort not to prevent plans available for subsidies from offering abortion coverage, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had included in the House Democrats' bill a complicated formula to separate federal subsidies from private dollars, requiring plans to use only private funds to reimburse providers for abortion services.
Abortion opponents rejected Pelosi's approach, arguing that covering abortions through policies that are subsidized by the government would violate current law.
A new amendment, offered Saturday by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., as the House neared a final vote on the bill, would effectively ban abortion coverage by all plans that are bought using taxpayer dollars. Abortions could be covered only under the exceptions that exist in current law.
Including the Stupak provision won Democrats strong support from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which urged Catholics to "lend their full-throated support" to the Democrats' health-care bill.
The amendment would not prevent insurers from covering abortion services for policyholders who pay their entire premiums without government assistance.
But abortion-rights advocates said the result would be a "de facto ban" on insurance companies offering abortion services in all plans sold under new insurance exchanges that would be created to help those without job-based coverage find policies. That's because many of those using the exchange would be getting subsidies.
Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., said he was prepared to vote for the health-overhaul package even if it included some unsettling language, such as the abortion provision that some anti-abortion Democrats and Republicans wanted to include.
![]()
"I am pro-choice," he said. "But I don't believe this language will really change the status quo."
However, when the vote came late Saturday, he voted against the measure, which nonetheless passed by a bipartisan vote of 240-194.
Material from The Associated Press is included in this report.
On the left hand, answers aren't easy
Getting active outside can bring sunshine to your winter
How to encourage healthy computing
Obese people asked to eat fast food for health study
Charlie Sheen claims AA has a 5 percent success rate — is he right?

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwautos
Turismo upgrade "Gran Turismo 5: XL Edition" for PlayStation 3 has features such as new car-tuning settings, new NASCAR vehicles, better replay video...
Post a comment
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Quick decisions: How Washington hired its new football staff
- Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looms
- Justin Wilcox's versatile defensive style is the right fit for Huskies | Jerry Brewer
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- It's Terrence Time: Enigmatic Ross leads Huskies
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- Club promoter convicted in brutal 2010 murder of Des Moines prostitute
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
469 - Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looming
359 - Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
286 - 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
242 - Source: NY, California to sign mortgage settlement
231 - Oregon live game thread
155 - Pac-12 picks ... including the UW game
140 - Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
136 - AP Source: Obama to change birth control rule
124 - Worker: Josh Powell told son he had 'surprise'
100
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Darren Berg gets 18-year sentence for Ponzi scheme
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- Economy, blogs give survivalists new reason to look to Northwest
- State's share of mortgage settlement: $648 million
- Bellevue College adds a third bachelor's degree program
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review







