Originally published November 8, 2009 at 12:11 AM | Page modified November 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM
Comments (47)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Dems get past abortion hurdle
In a last-minute compromise to build a majority in the House, Democratic leaders agreed to new language on abortion that advocates say offers stronger guarantees that federal money will not be used for abortions and that critics say goes beyond upholding current law.
Tribune Washington Bureau
WASHINGTON — In a last-minute compromise to build a majority in the House, Democratic leaders agreed to new language on abortion that advocates say offers stronger guarantees that federal money will not be used for abortions and that critics say goes beyond upholding current law.
A longtime ban on federal funding of abortions has so far applied mostly to patients on Medicaid and to workers who receive health benefits through the federal government. Insurance policies sold to others have been free to offer abortion coverage, and many do.
The present ban contains exceptions for rape and incest or when the life of the mother is at stake.
The battle in the House focused on what rules would apply under heath-care overhaul. The Democrats' original bill would have allowed people getting federal subsidies to pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Abortion opponents dismissed that as an accounting gimmick.
A key component of the bills pending in Congress would provide federal subsidies to low- and middle-income Americans to help them buy insurance policies that meet minimum benefits standards set by the government. Millions of people would qualify for the subsidies, which would pay a significant portion of the premium.
In an effort not to prevent plans available for subsidies from offering abortion coverage, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., had included in the House Democrats' bill a complicated formula to separate federal subsidies from private dollars, requiring plans to use only private funds to reimburse providers for abortion services.
Abortion opponents rejected Pelosi's approach, arguing that covering abortions through policies that are subsidized by the government would violate current law.
A new amendment, offered Saturday by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., as the House neared a final vote on the bill, would effectively ban abortion coverage by all plans that are bought using taxpayer dollars. Abortions could be covered only under the exceptions that exist in current law.
Including the Stupak provision won Democrats strong support from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which urged Catholics to "lend their full-throated support" to the Democrats' health-care bill.
The amendment would not prevent insurers from covering abortion services for policyholders who pay their entire premiums without government assistance.
But abortion-rights advocates said the result would be a "de facto ban" on insurance companies offering abortion services in all plans sold under new insurance exchanges that would be created to help those without job-based coverage find policies. That's because many of those using the exchange would be getting subsidies.
Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., said he was prepared to vote for the health-overhaul package even if it included some unsettling language, such as the abortion provision that some anti-abortion Democrats and Republicans wanted to include.
![]()
"I am pro-choice," he said. "But I don't believe this language will really change the status quo."
However, when the vote came late Saturday, he voted against the measure, which nonetheless passed by a bipartisan vote of 240-194.
Material from The Associated Press is included in this report.
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Vaccine to kill nicotine buzz now in late tests by small drug firm
Cutting through breast-cancer confusion
Mammogram guidelines spark debate over health bill
The People's Pharmacy: People's Pharmacy: Pain relief for people who can't use NSAID drugs
Raw Video | Real Salt Lake receives the MLS Cup trophy
Real Salt Lake is handed the 2009 MLS Cup trophy at Qwest Field, November 22, 2009.

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwjobs

Post a comment

Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
How to tell your office you're gravely ill
Post a comment
nwautos

Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Tugboat sinks at Seattle waterfront pier
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- Craigslist adoption ad: A plea by young mother-to-be? A scam?
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
- Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
- Snow piles up on Cascade slopes
- Woman stabbed by stranger in North Seattle
- Husky Men's Basketball Blog | Saturday's Pac-10 games in review
- Senate vote clears hurdle
239 - Vikings easily beat the Seahawks
134 - Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
128 - Palin excitement builds in Tri-Cities
123 - Tight Senate vote launches health care over hurdle
122 - Cutting through breast-cancer confusion
90 - Historic health care bill clears Senate hurdle
82 - Game thread
70 - New York terror trials will restore faith in rule of law
62 - Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
54
- 'The Road' takes Viggo Mortensen to Mount St. Helens and Astoria, Ore.
- Child-support error costs nearly $21,000
- It's possible to recover a life lost to hoarding
- Washington state wines make annual best-of list
- Banff: powder, peaks & purity
- Chase shrugs off loss of CD investors
- Denny Triangle gains skyline, but tenants slow to come
- Protect yourself from baggage loss
- Northwest Living | On Whidbey, a unified home from multiple recycled parts
- Rediscovering Moab, 'the most beautiful place on Earth'






