Originally published Sunday, May 11, 2008 at 12:00 AM
Harmful chemical wafts off your TV
Common household dust has long been known to carry pesticides, allergens and other irritants. But the dust that coats your television sets...
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
Q & A
Question: What are chemical flame retardants?
Answer: Synthetic chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl ethers, or PBDEs, that help prevent the spread of fire by impeding the chemical reaction that causes it. They are commonly found in polyurethane foam products, such as the padding in furniture, textiles, televisions and computers.
Q: What's the concern?
A: The main concern is that PBDEs build up in the body over time. Data on how they affect humans are slowly emerging. Animal studies have shown that PBDEs harm the nervous system and alter hormonal functions and the development of reproductive organs. The most common flame retardant in use today has been found to cause cancer in lab rats. Industry officials said that the levels in people and the environment are low and that this commonly used flame retardant is safe.
Q: What's being done?
A: Many companies, including Sony, are phasing out the use of PBDEs in televisions — the average U.S. household has more than two television sets.
Q: What should you do?
A: The most important things are wash your hands often and dust your house. A study last year by researchers at Boston University's School of Public Health linked the presence of the flame retardants found in people to exposure to common dust, which can be inhaled in the air or ingested in food.
Fort Worth Star-Telegram
FORT WORTH, Texas — Common household dust has long been known to carry pesticides, allergens and other irritants.
But the dust that coats your television sets may answer why virtually every American tested has traces of a chemical flame retardant that may be harmful.
The flame retardants have been used for decades in television sets, computer-wire insulation, mattress stuffing, carpet padding and many other common household products. They have been found in household dust, but no one has been able to say how they got there and from what products.
A study by researchers at Boston University's School of Public Health appears to have pinpointed the largest source of chemical flame retardants as the dust on television sets.
Using a portable X-ray device, researchers sampled 19 Boston-area homes and found large volumes of the flame retardants in television dust.
One theory is that when the television heats up, the flame retardants in the TV vaporize into a gas, eventually settling into the dust in the air and on bookshelves, floors and appliances.
"I think this link between the flame retardants and dust in TVs is a really big deal," said Tom Webster, a Boston University epidemiologist who led the study.
That's true, in part, because millions of television sets are expected to be discarded in February when television broadcasts switch to digital signals, resulting in a much greater volume of flame retardants contaminating the environment. The flame retardants take decades to break down, and they have been shown to travel great distances in the air and water.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
Doctors may alter psychiatric diagnoses
NEW - 10:16 PM
Medical pot exceeds law, but no charges
First lady begins fight against childhood obesity
Internet browsing: Searching for happiness?
An anesthetic that stops only pain

shopping
events for Wednesday, Feb. 10
- Winter Blowout Sale at Hip Zephyr
- David Lawrence Moving Sale
- Hydrotherapy and Spa Services at Banya 5
- Girl Power Hour
editors' picks
- Pioneer Square shopping
- Independent bookstores
- Phinney Ridge & Greenwood shopping
- Local jewelry designers
- Alaska Air dropping Jones Soda beverages, going back to Coca-Cola
- Man found shot dead in pickup truck in Seattle
- Seattle is first U.S. stop for Picasso exhibit
- Husky Football Blog | Pac-10 expansion to get consideration over next year
- State Senate votes to clear way for tax increases
- Idol Confessions | "American Idol" hopeful from Seattle didn't make it to Hollywood afterall
- Belltown boulevard could be completed by early next year
- Nicole Brodeur | Chrisceda Clemmons' house wasn't the only casualty
- Brier Dudley's Blog | Google rolls its own Facebook & Twitter with Gmail "Buzz"
- Sex, drug rumors swirl about N.Y. Gov. Paterson
- Republicans may be no-shows at health-plan summit
278 - State Senate votes to clear way for tax increases
250 - Pac-10 expansion to get consideration over next year
249 - Lee undergoes foot surgery
231 - Obama: GOP and Dems together can spur job growth
210 - Fort Lewis soldier charged with abusing 4-year-old, holding her head in water
193 - Rivals names Martin one of Pac-10's best recruiters
143 - Belltown boulevard could be completed by early next year
127 - Bus-tunnel attack while guards watched prompts review of Metro security
118 - White House mocks Sarah Palin from podium
91
- Seattle is first U.S. stop for Picasso exhibit
- Belltown boulevard could be completed by early next year
- 747-8 soars smoothly on first outing
- Wine Adviser | Oregon's quality pinots join the bargain ranks
- Alaska Air dropping Jones Soda beverages, going back to Coca-Cola
- Snap out of your photo funk: How to make sense of all those piles of images
- How clean are those pre-washed salad greens?
- Answers to biggest Olympic TV questions
- Brier Dudley's Blog | Google rolls its own Facebook & Twitter with Gmail "Buzz"
- Jerry Brewer | Huskies softball pitcher Danielle Lawrie: A star on the field, not in her mind

