Originally published July 15, 2007 at 12:00 AM | Page modified July 15, 2007 at 2:01 AM
From blistering to bronze, the truth about tanning
It's the time of year when the tank tops and shorts come out and blindingly white skin begins to see the light. It's also the time when...
The Ann Arbor (Mich.) News
It's the time of year when the tank tops and shorts come out and blindingly white skin begins to see the light.
It's also the time when many outdoorsy types and sun worshippers experience their first sunburn, intentional or not.
Although we all know skin in its natural, untanned state is most healthy, many of us think we look healthier, thinner — heck, even hotter — with a burnished glow suggestive of leisurely hours under the sun.
With that in mind, here's a look at the conventional wisdom and realities of the burn-peel-tan life.
MYTH: Sunless tanning, also known as fake-a-bake, is risk-free.
REALITY: It is true that using any of a variety of lotions, sprays, gels, creams and powders from the multi-million-dollar sunless-tanning industry can impart a sun-kissed glow without exposure to dangerous UV rays.
But some researchers worry that the fashion for a bronzed look, even a cosmetically induced one, may encourage many people to seek a tanned appearance at any cost.
According to a study published last year in the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, young women who used sunless tanners were more likely to have been sunburned and to have visited tanning parlors compared with those who were not interested in and did not use such bronzing lotions.
The study, conducted at Boston University School of Medicine, also reported that, although many self-tanning products do not contain sunscreen, a number of young women believe they offer sun protection.
MYTH: A blistering sunburn is painful, but no big deal.
REALITY: False. Just one blistering sunburn doubles the likelihood of developing malignant melanoma, a deadly skin cancer, according to the National Institutes of Health.
MYTH: People with dark skin won't sunburn, aren't at risk for skin cancer and don't need sunscreen.
![]()
REALITY: Yes, people who have more pigment in their skin are less likely to burn and are less at risk for skin cancer. But everyone needs sunscreen, said Michigan dermatologist Dr. A. Craig Cattell.
MYTH: Tanning beds are safer than the sun.
REALITY: Uh, like, no. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has declared UV radiation from the sun and artificial sources, such as tanning beds and sun lamps, as a known carcinogen.
And a 2005 Swedish study demonstrated that regular exposure to tanning beds significantly elevates a person's risk for developing melanoma. Research has found that tanning lamps emit UV rays that can be up to 15 times stronger than the sun, according to the American Academy of Dermatology.
MYTH: If spending a little time in the sun allows the skin to produce healthy vitamin D, then the more time, the better.
REALITY: Maximum production of vitamin D occurs after brief exposure to UV radiation. The exact amount of time depends on many factors including geographic location, time of day, time of year, and skin type. A fair-skinned person in Boston or New York can get adequate vitamin D production in two to five minutes at noon, according to the academy.
So how's a pasty body supposed to play it safe in the sun?
The American Cancer Society has this alliteratively pleasing advice: Slip, slop, slap.
As in, slip on a long-sleeved shirt, slop on sunscreen of SPF 15 or higher and slap on a hat. It's the old abstinence line, but it works, say the experts.
On the left hand, answers aren't easy
Getting active outside can bring sunshine to your winter
How to encourage healthy computing
Obese people asked to eat fast food for health study
Charlie Sheen claims AA has a 5 percent success rate — is he right?

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech
nwautos
Are you one of the many hanging onto their old beater? Or do you just love that new-car smell? When did you last purchase a vehicle? Take our poll or....
Post a comment
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Proposal to link Market, aquarium may be too ambitious for Seattle
- Chilling 911 tapes reveal pleas for help to go to Josh Powell home
- UW's Shawn Kemp Jr. makes own way despite familiar name, number | Steve Kelley
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- NBA's David Stern open to league returning to Seattle
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- Prosecutor: Powell's final act ends doubt he killed wife
- Was idea of court-ordered test too much for Josh Powell?
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
428 - Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looming
344 - Sheriff's office unhappy with 911 dispatcher in caseworker's call
282 - 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
234 - Source: NY, California to sign mortgage settlement
196 - Pac-12 picks ... including the UW game
140 - Oregon live game thread
119 - Lakewood cop accused of taking donations for slain officers' families
108 - Department of Justice owes the Seattle Police Department an apology
87 - Thursday morning links --- and a video!!!
65
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Here it is: The secret to stir-fried chicken | Taste
- Local aerospace suppliers say they feel squeezed by Boeing
- Dicks channeled federal money to Puget Sound project his son ran
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review
- Buttoned Up: Nine immutable laws of time management
- Happy Hour: French-accented charm at Gainsbourg
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature










