anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Politics Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES


Friday, October 15, 2004 - Page updated at 06:00 P.M.

The Times endorses
The three tenures


E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
Most read articles Most read articles
Most e-mailed articles Most e-mailed articles
Reps. Norm Dicks, Jim McDermott and Adam Smith are seasoned congressmen with no strong challengers. They will be elected again, and this page endorses them, although each for different reasons.

They are all Democrats, but not alike. Dicks, who represents the 6th District, is a protégé of the late Sen. Warren Magnuson, the New Dealer who supported liberal causes and brought home the bacon for public projects. Upon election in 1976, Dicks wrangled a seat on the House Appropriations Committee, and he is still there, the "go-to guy" for public projects that need federal help.

He has fought for spending this page favored, such as the Pentagon purchase of Boeing 767 tankers, and that we opposed, such as light rail. He is an expert in the ways of Washington, D.C., and this state cannot do without him.

McDermott has represented the 7th District for 15 years and may have the seat for life. He is chairman of the liberal Americans for Democratic Action and a member of the far-left-leaning Progressive Caucus. He is Congress' only psychiatrist and champions a Canadian-style medical system. He once lived in Africa, and has almost single-handedly fought for African trade preferences and support for AIDS programs there.

McDermott was the only one of the three endorsed here to have voted against the Iraq war resolution of 2002. That year, he traveled to Iraq and opponents dubbed him "Baghdad Jim." He also got in a public argument with Dicks, who predicted that U.S. forces would find significant stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons.

McDermott was right about the war, though there were times when he overstepped the bounds of prudence. He has uttered strikingly odd statements, such as that the Bush administration could have captured Saddam Hussein earlier if it wanted to.

There have also been times when he could have paid closer attention to his district, taking a lesson from Dicks. But McDermott does reflect his district, which voted only 21 percent for Bush in 2000 and voted almost as much as that for McDermott's challenger from the Green Party.

The 9th District's Smith is co-chairman of the New Democrat Coalition. A financial realist, he argues, unlike the party's left-wingers, that Social Security urgently needs to be reformed. He is a vocal critic of the Bush administration's deficit spending, as all Democrats are this year, but Smith projects the sense that he means it.

Like Dicks, Smith has a military footprint in his district. He is young, smart, pro-trade and pro-military. The 9th was once a swing district, and the Republicans could contest it if Smith moved on for bigger things. Probably not before then.

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive

More endorsements headlines...

 POLITICS NEWS SEARCH
Today Archive

Advanced search

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top