Advertising
anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Education Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES





Tuesday, January 20, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Legislature 2004
House OKs lower school-levy threshold

By Rebecca Cook
The Associated Press

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
0

OLYMPIA — Legislators get elected with a simple majority of votes. So why can't school levies pass that way?

The state House says schools should be able to raise property taxes with a simple majority vote. Last night, by a vote of 68 to 29, the House passed a constitutional amendment to allow that.

The bill now goes to the Senate, where majority Republicans killed a similar measure last year over concerns that taxpayers could be hit with staggering increases.

The state constitution requires that 60 percent of voters approve property-tax levies for local school districts — a legacy of a Depression-era property-tax revolt by farmers. That means school levies can, and often do, fail with 59 percent of the vote.

"All we do today is give the power to the people to invest in our kids," said Rep. Kathy Haigh, D-Shelton, her voice tight with emotion. She said she was inspired to run for the Legislature after being frustrated as a school-board member when school-levy votes failed just shy of 60 percent.

"It is devastating," Haigh said.

Rep. Dave Quall, D-Mount Vernon, said "majority rules" is the democratic way.

"Given the challenges taking place in public schools with education reform, it makes it more imperative than ever before that we do a simple majority to help districts get the funds they need," said Quall, the House Education Committee chairman.

Several Republicans argued the measure was unnecessary and could overburden taxpayers.

advertising
"Changing our constitution is a very, very important step, and it should be a difficult step," said Rep. Barry Sehlin, R-Oak Harbor. He noted that in 2002, the failure rate statewide for school-bond levies on the first try was 14 percent: "That does not seem to me to imply a tremendous, overwhelming problem passing levies."

Because it's a constitutional amendment, the bill requires a two-thirds majority in both the state House and the Senate. Then the measure would go to voters for final approval.

Last year's similar measure passed in the House with a vote of 73-25, only to die in the Senate. This year the House vote was a little closer, with some Republicans switching from "yes" to "no" votes. But it still got the required two-thirds to pass.

Senate Education Chairman Stephen Johnson, R-Kent, said he would consider lifting the supermajority requirement only if the bill included taxpayer protections — for example, requiring that school-levy elections be held in November to guarantee the highest turnout, rather than at random times during the year when voter turnout could be skewed toward levy supporters.

"There needs to be some constitutional protection for taxpayers so they wouldn't have a large spike in their taxes," Johnson said yesterday.

Under House Joint Resolution 4204, the 50 percent majority would apply only to levies; construction bonds still would require a 60 percent vote for passage.

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

More education headlines

 EDUCATION NEWS
 SEARCH

Today Archive

Advanced search

 
advertising

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top