Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, May 14, 2009 at 3:35 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

Stockholders should demand a say on executive pay

Shareholders at Dow Chemical pass a "say on pay" measure — a proposal for monitoring executive pay. Other companies should do the same.

Seattle Times editorial

SHAREHOLDERS of Dow Chemical have created a right for themselves to vote every year on executive pay and benefits. The company's board of directors, which is supposed to represent them, advised them not to do it — and they did it anyway.

Good for them. Executive pay at America's public companies has risen to sometimes outrageous levels, and shareholders need to monitor it.

In the past year, Dow Chemical botched an acquisition and cut the shareholder dividend for the first time, even while CEO Andrew Liveris was reporting compensation of $12.8 million. At Dow Chemical, the shareholders had reason to be sore.

If it were only Dow Chemical shareholders doing this, the news might be dismissed.

Timothy Smith of Walden Asset Management, Boston, said "say on pay" resolutions have been approved by shareholders at 15 companies this year, including Pfizer (52 percent approval), Apple Computer (52 percent) and Prudential (59 percent).

Hewlett-Packard, Occidental Petroleum and a few other companies have agreed without a vote — and all the recipients of TARP bailout funds have had to accept it also.

Not everyone has. At Boeing, the effort failed but still garnered 42 percent of the shares, a figure that must give board members pause.

The push for this sort of measure originally came from unions, Christian groups and social-investment firms such as Walden.

But Smith said these votes would not have succeeded without support from mainstream financial advisers and money managers such as CalPERS and TIAA-CREF. Simply, executive compensation in public companies has been getting too out of line with reality.

Under "say on pay," the vote is routine, like the vote every year to approve the auditor. Unlike the auditor vote, the pay vote is not binding; the board of directors can ignore it. But if they do, they contradict the supposition that they represent shareholders, who are the real owners of corporate America.

"Say on pay" is a healthy thing. Bring it on.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising