Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published May 11, 2009 at 4:14 PM | Page modified May 12, 2009 at 2:55 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

Maligning Seattle schools superintendent doesn't change budget reality

Seattle School District officials might have handled their legal responsibilities inartfully by sending a letter informing teachers of contract reductions. But budget cuts, and state law, required the notice.

Seattle Times editorial

Seattle school district officials followed Washington state law by notifying teachers of a proposed one-day reduction in the length of next year's contract. But they are rightfully apologizing for the timing.

The move occurred because the state Legislature eliminated one of two Learning Improvement Days and removed the accompanying $1 million in funding in the recently approved state budget.

Seattle, already facing a $34 million budget gap, cannot make up the cut. Moreover, state collective-bargaining laws require teachers be notified of any contractual changes by May 15.

The letter from Superintendent Maria Goodloe-Johnson states the district cannot renew the 182-day contract, but can offer a 181-day contract. Information on how to appeal the proposal is included.

Response by the teachers union, the Seattle Education Association, has been unhelpful and destructive. Union leaders are being purposely obtuse about the letter's intent, even threatening legal action.

This strategy of killing the message by maligning the messenger shouldn't work. This issue is less about the superintendent and more about tough state budget cuts.

Indeed, the letter could have been more artfully written. Stripped of its educational jargon and legalese, the district's six-paragraph notification should have been a paragraph or two. Blame district lawyers.

District leaders concede the letter's timing, during Teacher Appreciation Week, was terrible. They say letters were meant to go out this week but some were mistakenly sent last week. That's the kind of mistake public-relations nightmares are made of.

Missteps aside, the district should be notifying teachers of the reality wrought by education spending cutbacks. Statewide, 3,000 to 5,000 teachers are being notified that they will be laid off as a result of education budget cuts. District officials have said they hope to avoid laying off teachers by using cash reserves and cutting other areas, but they have not ruled out the possibility of layoffs.

The teachers union's ire is uncalled for and misdirected.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising