Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, March 11, 2009 at 3:55 PM

Comments (0)     E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

Splitting up state DSHS will waste money, not save it

The Department of Social and Health Services is more known for its multimillion-dollar lawsuit settlements than for success in its role as caretaker of the state's vulnerable. This Seattle Times editorial urges lawmakers not to waste more money by splitting up the agency.

Seattle Times editorial

PERENNIAL proposals to break up the Department of Social and Health Services are correctly dismissed as budgetary scapegoating, yet they have exposed a critical truth: The $20 billion annual cost of running DSHS is too high and the results too minimal.

The latest proposal to break the massive agency into four came from Rep. Mike Armstrong, R-Wenatchee. The bill would eliminate DSHS within two years and replace it with smaller agencies: the Department of Economic Services, Department of Medical Assistance, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services and the Department of Children's Services.

A bill in the Senate would privatize many of the agency's duties, particularly in the area of child welfare.

Gov. Christine Gregoire wisely nixed the efforts for this legislative session while the $8 billion budget hole looms.

DSHS is the most expensive and inefficient state agency. Taxpayers send $10 billion a year to DSHS and the federal government contributes another $10 billion annually.

For its money, the public endures a beleaguered agency plagued with outdated computer systems and burned-out caseworkers.

Former Gov. Dan Evans created the agency in 1970 to provide one-stop shopping for social services. The entire needs of families could be addressed at once, from medical care to public assistance to rehabilitation services. Over the years, tasks have been pulled from the agency in a bid to make it more efficient.

Improvements have come along the way. The agency has commendably reduced caseloads to allow social workers to spend more time on individual needs. The agency is streamlining its computer networks so information is more accessible.

But overall, the agency flounders and mistakes are costly.

DSHS is under a court order to institute foster-care reforms after settling a class-action lawsuit.

Recently the state paid $320,000 to settle a claim that it failed to protect a young boy who was abused and eventually died in foster care. Years earlier, state and federal authorities paid $5 million to the same boy and his three siblings to settle claims that they were horribly abused.

Attention must be paid to DSHS. But breaking up the agency or contracting out its tasks is not a viable option this legislative session.

Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Comments
No comments have been posted to this article.


Get home delivery today!

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

Advertising

Video

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising