Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Monday, November 24, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Comments (5)     E-mail article     Print view

Editorial

Grab savings in Washington ferry contracts

During this difficult economic time, the state Legislature should seek the best deal for Washington taxpayers as it builds replacement ferries. That means being open to expand the competitive field out of state and being more reasonable about its construction deadlines.

MONEY is tight everywhere. So this is no time for state government to be lavishing extra money on an industry merely because it is in Washington state and can't compete with businesses in other regions. This is a time for flexibility and bargain hunting on behalf of state taxpayers.

A consultant for the state Legislature's Joint Transportation Committee earlier this week pointed out some flaws in the policymakers' approach that are contributing to the difficulty of getting replacement ferry boats at the lowest possible price.

The Legislature has issued a call for bids to build replacement ferry boats but limited the contest only to Washington shipbuilders. That's problematic for a couple of reasons, not the least of which is that shipbuilders in other parts of the country where labor and steel costs are much lower could deliver a boat for millions less.

The other problem is that projects restricted to companies of only a single state are not eligible for federal grants, which require a nationwide search. Consider that about $17 million in federal funding is helping pay for the 144-auto ferry project's propulsion system built in Ontario, Calif. That's like leaving money in the street.

Experts pointed out the state's 18-month timeline for delivery is too rigid, saying no boatbuilder could make that schedule. The lone bidder for the contract likely built in $6,000-a-day penalties. The state could save money with a realistic schedule.

The rationale for the build-in-Washington requirement is to help ensure the viability of a local boatbuilding industry.

Senate Transportation Chair Mary Margaret Haugen, D-Camano Island, argues giving the contract to a Washington boatbuilder has some allure as unemployment rates edge higher: "I'd rather pay more for the boats than pay more in unemployment insurance."

But propping up businesses is not the government's job. Ensuring a competitive business environment is. During difficult times, getting the best bargain for the taxpayer should be the top priority.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...

E-mail article Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

Comments
Great! Haugen is in favor of unbridled corporate welfare. Do we need to replicate Detroit and the greedy UAW here??? We already have whacky,...  Posted on November 24, 2008 at 5:55 PM by Gimme a Break!. Jump to comment
THe press continues to fail in understanding the issue. No wonder you are failing. FIrst WA is competitive. Problem with contract was WSF asked...  Posted on November 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM by BartFallon. Jump to comment
SOME POINT TO PONDER ABOUT THIS INDUSTRY AND THIS PARTICIULAR PROJECT. First of all, “BONDING” is the biggest challenge for new vessel...  Posted on November 24, 2008 at 12:24 PM by Whiteoak. Jump to comment

UPDATE - 02:37 PM
Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: Iran's leaderless revolution: searching for a Yeltsin

NEW - 02:26 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The triumph and tragedy of Michael Jackson

NEW - 02:48 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: What does a homosexual demon look like?

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: Social networking in Iran: standing witness, one for another

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising