Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, August 27, 2008 at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Editorial

District still can't see forest for the trees

A King County judge's order temporarily preserves about 100 trees on the Ingraham High School campus. More important, it preserves the integrity of public process.

Seattle Public Schools sometimes employs an act-first-feign-contrition-later approach to dealing with the public. No wonder then that citizen complaints of being shut out have grown louder.

It's time to switch tactics in favor of a more conciliatory approach. That advice comes in a King County judge's astute ruling in the case of the $24 million expansion of Ingraham High School and the future of 100 trees nearby.

Judge John Erlick has halted the district's plan to fell the trees by the start of school next Tuesday. He correctly admonishes the district for putting the cart before the horse by seeking to cut down the trees first and apply for a city permit later.

Credit for exposing the district's plan goes to a group calling itself Save Our Trees. The members are neighbors of Ingraham who hope to preserve the trees for their scenery and contribution to wildlife habitat.

The district's response has been less than genuine. Faced with vocal community opposition, the district withdrew its application for permits to build an addition to the school. It then contended it was free to cut down the trees because none of them constituted "exceptional trees," under Seattle's legal code. The overall strategy — breathtakingly sneaky — was to remove the trees and then reapply for master-use permits.

The School Board's murky role in all of this must be cleared up. They either failed to set the tone for sincere public engagement or they were ignored by the district's facilities staff. Neither bodes well for the board members who invoked leadership skills and an affinity for public process in their recent election campaigns.

The district plans to have the ruling dismissed on the grounds that school officials weren't properly notified of the hearing and that the issue is outside the court's jurisdiction.

More legal tactics would be a disappointing response. The district may see this as a skirmish over use of its land, but members of the public sees a battle against them, using their money, over an issue from which they were mostly excluded. That's insulting.

The next steps ought to be a review of the expansion plan with an eye toward saving some trees. Mayor Greg Nickels has already indicated this is the direction he favors. The outcome won't be amenable to everyone — some or none of the trees may remain — but everyone will have been heard.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: A politically correct — and dangerous — delicacy about the Fort Hood shooting

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: Salute those Muslim-Americans who stand up for their country

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: A tragic clash of cultures

Advertising

Video

Smash Putt! Miniature Golf
Smash Putt! Miniature Golf Apocalypse in Capitol Hill offers an industrial 9-hole course, driving range and bar.

Girls Soccer: Mercer Island vs. Glacier Peak
Opening day at Crystal Mountain
Video shows violent arrest by SPD
Fort Lewis Memorial
Highlights: Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Seattle International Cabaret Festival
Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising