Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published June 26, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 26, 2008 at 9:30 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Editorial

Child-welfare disparities apparent, fixes vexing

Washington state's child-welfare system acknowledges its deeply rooted racial and socioeconomic disparities.

Information

Read the full report: www.dshs.wa.gov/ca/pubs/disproportion.asp

Washington state's child-welfare system acknowledges its deeply rooted racial and socioeconomic disparities.

Acknowledging them is the easy part. Finding resolution is a vexing challenge for a system bent on improving outcomes, particularly among low-income and minority children.

We now have some answers thanks to the blueprint released by the Statewide Disproportionality Advisory Committee. Convened by the Legislature last session, the committee offers 100 pages of analysis and confirmation of biases throughout the child-welfare system.

At every juncture, African-American, Hispanic and Native American children fare worse than white children. In King County, African-American children are 8 percent of the population but half the number of kids languishing in foster care four years after initial placement.

A search for human error comes up mostly empty. Caseworkers challenged by large caseloads and compressed days are not deliberately unfair to minority children. The culprits are policies that fall heaviest on poor and minority families.

Here's an example: Parents are required to meet certain standards, such as maintaining homes with electricity, telephone, water and other basic amenities. Poor families, more likely of color, have a harder time meeting the requirements and, when viewed by child-welfare officials, face steeper challenges proving their fitness as parents.

Another area where biases come into play is reporting violations. Sixty percent of the calls to Child Protective Services come from schools, clinics and other official agencies required by law to report suspicions of abuse and neglect. Minority and poor children are reported to CPS more often because they come into contact with government services more often.

Known as visibility bias, the statistics make it appear families of color have a higher incidence of abuse or neglect, when no such correlation exists.

Our problem mirrors a national predicament. Nearly 60 percent of the children in foster care nationwide are of color.

The Department of Social and Health Services is computerizing child-welfare decisions to eliminate the potential for bias. Improved caseworker training makes sense.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

UPDATE - 02:37 PM
Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: Iran's leaderless revolution: searching for a Yeltsin

NEW - 02:26 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The triumph and tragedy of Michael Jackson

NEW - 02:48 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: What does a homosexual demon look like?

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: Social networking in Iran: standing witness, one for another

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising