Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published June 4, 2008 at 12:00 AM | Page modified June 4, 2008 at 11:22 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Editorial

Spread the burden of climate change

This week, the U.S. Senate is debating climate-change legislation that would set aggressive goals for reducing carbon emissions nationally.

This week, the U.S. Senate is debating climate-change legislation that would set aggressive goals for reducing carbon emissions nationally.

This work has been left undone for so long that several states, including Washington, already have begun to set aggressive emission-reduction goals.

High in the senators' consideration should be how to minimize the inevitable increase in costs not just in energy but in goods and services because of higher energy costs — or at least to spread the burden fairly. People already are struggling in an economy convulsing from soaring fuel costs and the mortgage-industry crisis, among other things.

The energy-price increases from the emissions-reduction goals will pale in comparison to the economic devastation later in the century if nothing is done.

Still, unless people can afford the changes, lawmakers risk a backlash. Sponsors of the climate-change bill say people's costs will be offset by proceeds from a so-called cap-and-trade system. Companies are issued permits for their emissions and have to buy the right to pollute more from those who pollute less.

By 2050, the Senate climate bill would require emissions of greenhouse gases be cut by about 70 percent. The bill is sponsored by Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and John Warner, R-Va.

On Monday, President Bush, whose administration's indolence on this issue finally has been swamped by the public's acceptance of the science, criticized the bill as too costly, threatening a veto. Some GOP senators are threatening to filibuster for similar reasons.

To say "no" is not enough — especially after seven years of a presidential term. Opponents in Congress have some valid concerns. Better they work to improve this bill than try to delay critical action even longer.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: A tragic clash of cultures

Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: Tuesday's election shoots down the myth of a political realignment

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: Prosecutor's fishing trip blocks justice for man behind bars

Advertising

Video

Ken Auletta talks about "Googled"
Ken Auletta talks about Google with Brier Dudley at the Seattle Central Library.

Medal of Honor
Pelosi answers questions at Swedish Medical Center
Pelosi speaks at Swedish Medical Center
"Pistol" Pete Ryan
Mourners gather at KeyArena for slain officer's memorial
Procession for slain SPD officer
Election Night: Approve R-71
Election Night: Reject R-71
Election Night: Joe Mallahan

Marketplace

nwautos

2009's most fuel-efficient sedansnew
Choosing a new sedan? Weigh the impact of your choice on your wallet and on the planet.
Post a comment

Open Houses

Find this weekend's open house listings.
Or search by location:

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising