Saturday, May 10, 2008 - Page updated at 12:00 AM
E-mail article
Print view Share:
Digg
Newsvine
Editorial
"Hate": Will B.C. tribunal know it when it sees it?
The Democracy Papers is a series of articles, essays and editorial opinion examining threats to our freedoms of speech. Technology has created space for more voices, yet fewer and fewer are heard.
The American press and media are being decimated by consolidation. This transformation from many owners into five or six large corporations and the lessening of small outlets for radio, newspapers, magazines and music are chilling a once robust marketplace of ideas. What should American's do? This series explores the arguments and the backlash.
Democracy Papers online archive:
www.seattletimes/thedemocracypapers
Daily Democracy, the Democracy Papers blog: blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/dailydemocracy.
Canada, which has made "hate speech" against the law, now struggles to balance political correctness with freedom.
We do not envy the Canadians. They have entrusted to their government a power Americans never would, and they follow it into foolishness.In the week of June 2, a body of bureaucrats called the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal will call on the carpet author Mark Steyn. A bellicose champion of the West, Steyn predicts in his new book, "America Alone," that Muslims will swarm over Europe, ban alcohol and put women in veils. Maclean's magazine printed an excerpt that outraged Islamic Canadians, who complained to human-rights tribunals in Ottawa and the provinces.
Steyn's book may well be hateful in some way. The Seattle Times thought the Danish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad were hateful, and did not reprint them. That was one newspaper's decision. In Canada, the law makes such questions the government's decision.
British Columbia now bans all words and images "likely to expose a person ... to hatred or contempt" because of race, religion, age, disability, sex, marital status or sexual orientation." This sounds like a libel law for groups, except that libel is a misstatement of fact that damages an individual reputation. In the United States, for a public figure to be libeled, the false statement has to be made maliciously or recklessly.
The Canadian idea of hate speech is less specific and more dangerous. Hate is like obscenity, about which Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart famously said, "I know it when I see it." The difference is that a ban on obscenity does not touch political discourse, and a ban on hate does.
It also sets up government for open ridicule. Steyn is gleefully marketing his book as a "Canadian hate crime" and daring the tribunal to pronounce him bad.
Racial harmony in Canada would have been safer had the question never become official.
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

Enjoy 3 courses for $30, May 1-29
Dine at 23 new Seattle-area restaurants.
New Urban Eats, a dining event from NWsource.
View participating restaurants
Enter to win dinner for two
- Lawyers pressured Nickels to say Seattle won't miss the Sonics | Sonics
- Ken Griffey Jr. pays off debt to Reds teammate in pennies
- Road trip! 10 close-to-home summer vacations
- Mugging of cyclist in tunnel spurs warning
- Man kept posing as cop to get drugs, police say
- Backward-evolving Lake Washington fish lends clues about genetics
- Jailed museum director's death linked to infection
- Gay marriage opponents vow to fight Calif. ruling
- Seahawks sign AFL receiver Chas Gessner to a 2-year contract
- Seattle U. prof held in online sex sting
- Road trip! 10 close-to-home summer vacations
- UW plan merges forestry school, 5 others
- Mount Rainier's Paradise Inn rejuvenated, ready for guests
- A personality test for your cat
- Backward-evolving Lake Washington fish lends clues about genetics
- Mugging of cyclist in tunnel spurs warning
- Region's jazz legacy in spotlight again at Essentially Ellington
- Gay marriage opponents vow to fight Calif. ruling
- Obama's Appalachian problem | Close-up
- New off-leash dog park opens in Sammamish

