Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, January 3, 2008 at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Editorial

Let Maple Valley annex its future

Maple Valley is curiously sitting on the outside looking in as King County orchestrates a land-use deal that directly affects the future and finances of this fast-growing community.

Maple Valley is curiously sitting on the outside looking in as King County orchestrates a land-use deal that directly affects the future and finances of this fast-growing community.

One of two things should happen before King County gives a developer exclusive rights to buy and develop 156 acres smack in the middle of Maple Valley. Preferably, the spirit of the state's Growth Management Act will be respected and the city will be allowed to annex the site and take a direct role in planning before development begins. Otherwise, the city must be an active partner in joint planning with the county — not as an adviser or commentator, but a full partner with the county in which mutual agreements are negotiated and settled.

The city might, frankly, be looking at less density than the county would allow, but that hardly means the community is hostile to growth. Maple Valley's population jumped 30 percent in 10 years because it was the affordable-housing alternative for thousands of families.

County Executive Ron Sims drafted an artful proposal, with key, early enabling legislation by the County Council, to create an exception for a no-bid contract to link the sale and development of county property as part of a larger deal to secure desirable green space.

This politically complex arrangement was laid out by Seattle Times reporters Jim Brunner and Lauren Vane, who used open-records laws to secure explanatory details.

The county is moving toward a change of zoning from rural to urban that would allow more than 1,200 homes to be built. In that process, the county would also collect the usual and customary fees and taxes. Eventually, this vast residential area would be Maple Valley's to provide urban services and incorporate into city life, without a nickel of mitigation money.

This same county is laboring mightily to offload other urban centers — unincorporated islands in the county that are expensive to provide with municipal levels of service.

Last September, Sims wrote on these pages, "The city of Maple Valley has a rare opportunity to shape its future — one that comes along only once in a lifetime." Sims should work to make that claim sound less ironic.

Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company

UPDATE - 02:37 PM
Charles Krauthammer / Syndicated columnist: Iran's leaderless revolution: searching for a Yeltsin

NEW - 02:26 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The triumph and tragedy of Michael Jackson

NEW - 02:48 PM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: What does a homosexual demon look like?

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: Social networking in Iran: standing witness, one for another

Advertising

Video

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 
Advertising