The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWapartments | NWsource | Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Tuesday, December 11, 2007 - Page updated at 01:39 PM

E-mail article     Print view      Share:    Digg     Newsvine

The Democracy Papers

... Build broadband

The Democracy Papers is a series of articles, essays and editorial opinion examining threats to our freedoms of speech. Technology has created space for more voices, yet fewer and fewer are heard.

The American press and media are being decimated by consolidation. This transformation from many owners into five or six large corporations and the lessening of small outlets for radio, newspapers, magazines and music are chilling a once robust marketplace of ideas. What should Americans do? This series explores the arguments and the backlash.

Democracy Papers online archive:
www.seattletimes/thedemocracypapers

Daily Democracy, the Democracy Papers blog: blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/dailydemocracy.

The Internet is an important conduit to commerce and innovation, a medium that has wildly exciting communication potential. Yet, the United States' paltry broadband network lags behind most of the industrialized world.

Our weak Internet infrastructure not only puts the nation at a competitive economic disadvantage, it threatens democracy. Japan and South Korea have cheaper Internet service that is many times faster than that in the U.S. To get an idea of how far behind Japan we are, think of our network as a Soviet-era grocery store and Japan's as Whole Foods.

At least a dozen countries have zipped by America because of smart government regulations that encouraged the build-out of networks and promoted competition. It is time Congress and the Federal Communications Commission did the same.

A national discussion about what we want, and need, for the Internet of the future is part of the solution.

Should it be treated like the airwaves, which belong to the public? Can network providers like AT&T be forced to allow broadband startups onto their lines? Could a system modeled after public utility districts help broadband reach areas that are not attractive to network providers?

So far, the discussion has been defined by lobbyists for the telecom and cable companies, which have spent many millions of dollars opposing network neutrality and any legislation that would force competition. How much will their networks be worth if all the brightest minds migrate to where their talents can contribute to society and be monetized?

Americans should be worried about the current level of service. This is a serious problem that goes beyond the annoyance of slow-loading Web pages. Many rural and poor areas still use painfully slow dial-up Internet connections and will not get broadband anytime soon. Those with no access, or prohibitive access, will be silenced as more communication, services and news media jump to the Internet.

Not only does the U.S. risk falling behind its partners and competitors, a large swath of American voices will disappear if broadband is left to network providers. That's a great loss for a democracy.

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company

NEW - 05:00 PM
The Times recommends ...: Snohomish, North King legislative races: experience matters

The Times recommends ...: For Congress: Re-elect Baird in the 3rd, McMorris Rodgers in the 5th and Smith in the 9th districts

Marketplace