Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

Sound Transit case leaves bad tax rule

Last week, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that Sound Transit could continue to collect its car-tabs tax, which had been repealed by...

Last week, the Washington Supreme Court ruled that Sound Transit could continue to collect its car-tabs tax, which had been repealed by a statewide vote of the people. Legally, the court was probably correct, but it was not fair to taxpayers.

The case was about Initiative 776, sponsored by Tim Eyman. This page did not support I-776, but in 2002, Washington's voters did, and it became law. All car-tabs taxes in excess of $30 per year, including Sound Transit's 0.3-percent motor-vehicle excise tax, were repealed. How can government collect a tax that has been repealed? Because it had pledged the tax to back its bonds. In 1999, investors bought $350 million of Sound Transit bonds, some of them30-year obligations, relying on that promise. To break that promise would be "impairing the obligations of contracts," which is forbidden in the state constitution.

So said the court last week. Attorney General Rob McKenna, representing the people of Washington, had agreed with that part. But McKenna had gone further and argued that Sound Transit should use the revenue from a repealed tax only to retire bonds to which it had been promised, and not for anything else. When enough revenue had been set aside to pay the bonds, the tax should come off.

The court said it didn't have the authority to order that. The question had never come up, and there was no law about it.

There should be one. Until there is, any public agency funded by its own tax can inoculate that tax from repeal merely by pledging it to pay a bond. For every dollar's worth of tax, the bond might require only15 cents, or a nickel, or even a penny. No matter; the pledge would insure the whole tax against repeal.

The Seattle Monorail Authority almost did this — and what a mess that would have been. Whether by accident or intention, Sound Transit has done it.

McKenna had the right idea: If a tax is repealed, and it has been pledged to a bond, its revenues should go only to the bond-repayment fund. The Legislature needs to make that the law.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising