Link to jump to start of content The Seattle Times Company Jobs Autos Homes Rentals NWsource Classifieds seattletimes.com
The Seattle Times Editorials
Traffic | Weather | Your account Movies | Restaurants | Today's events

Friday, March 17, 2006 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

E-mail article     Print view

Active Democracy

Special to The Times

With so much talk these days of spreading democracy to oppressed nations, we seem to forget what it means to live in a truly democratic country. Most would agree that we live in a democracy - but do we understand the implications of this? If we do, then someone please explain why voter participation in presidential elections hovers at just more than fifty percent, while turnout in legislative and local elections remains a joke. And voting is only the first step.

As Americans, we champion ourselves as the blueprint of democracy - the standard all other nations should strive toward - yet we are content with the fact that we can simply call ourselves a democracy. A democracy is not truly a democracy without the active engagement of its people. Abraham Lincoln spoke of a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Our founding fathers put their lives on the line to establish a democracy here in the United States, while Iraqi citizens and soldiers now risk their lives for this cause. In light of this, it is hard for me to watch so many Americans take for granted all the opportunities a democratic society offers and not take advantage of our hard-won freedoms.

We say we are discontented with our society and national policy, but nothing will change if we can't get past the stale taboo of "talking politics" and view voting as merely a civic "duty" and obligation. We will continue to be disappointed with officials in all levels and branches of government if we remain merely spectators.

We further excuse ourselves from participation by saying we cannot or will not make a difference and that our views are not represented by either dominant political party. I know the feeling, but rather than letting this be the reason for apathy and disengagement, why don't we use this as an opportunity to speak up and put forth some fresh ideas? I'm not talking anarchy, just a more vibrant and engaged electorate that is not confined by the idea that they do not fall in line with the political extremes.

While this year's legislative session has already wrapped up, we have some very important issues and contentious races coming up at the midterm elections this fall including a hotly contested seat for U.S. Senate. This is a race that is next in importance to the presidential election, a perfect time to step up the involvement and debate, especially among newly eligible voters.

I have seen, first-hand, the effect a passionate instructor can have on students during a mere few weeks. The important role our education system can play in promoting an active citizenry cannot be overstated. Currently, civic education classes are not required of all high school students and are often viewed as a throw-away senior course for those who do take it. We can't expect young people to suddenly become politically active when they do not even know the basics of our government and system.

College students have long been known for their "radical" protests. But rather than waving signs, or the other extreme of sitting on the sidelines, wouldn't it be more effective if we got involved from the beginning? Getting involved at the grassroots level, we could be known as setters of policy, helping to influence the course of government. As college-educated citizens, we are exactly the type of people that should be getting more involved. Let's be the first generation that stops spewing overused slogans at the opposing political party and actually starts being true democratic participants.

Linda Tomko is a UW senior, student senator and a member of the College Republicans.

Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company

Marketplace