Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Thursday, December 15, 2005 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

Editorial

"Tookie" Williams' life of regret

The execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams, convicted killer of four and Crips gang co-founder, ought not be the match thrown on the fiery...

The execution of Stanley "Tookie" Williams, convicted killer of four and Crips gang co-founder, ought not be the match thrown on the fiery debate over the death penalty.

This page has been for the death penalty, because we believe that the most-heinous crimes deserve the ultimate punishment.

If Williams is Exhibit A for any argument, let it be in support of the careful application of the death penalty. This man was executed, but not before decades of deliberate and thorough analysis of his case.

Williams is not a martyr. He was convicted of the 1979 murders of four people in two separate robberies. He used a sawed-off shotgun to kill his victims, despite two being so elderly that the use of lethal force was as gratuitous as it was cruel.

From 1981 to early Tuesday, Williams waged a battle from death row to prove his innocence — and when state and federal courts were unmoved, he switched to a claim of redemption.

The Hollywood glitterati, including actors Jamie Foxx, Sean Penn and Danny Glover, waged a public-relations crusade to keep Williams alive. Such star power could be better used in the battle to free gang-ridden neighborhoods of the wanton crime that turns a walk to school into a life-or-death proposition.

Williams aside, a national debate over the death penalty is a good thing. If it is to remain an option of the justice system, we must find ways to ensure its fair application.

Former Illinois Gov. George Ryan emptied his state's death row after information, including DNA evidence, revealed that some of those sentenced to death were innocent, and raised strong suspicions about fairness in the other cases.

The U.S. Supreme Court reversed its long-standing position on the constitutionality of executing 16- and 17-year-olds. These are reforms that, coupled with the lengthy appeals process embedded in the law, make the death penalty an acceptable, if rare, option.

In 2004, 59 inmates nationwide were executed, six fewer than in 2003.

Compelling arguments can be made for penal reform. We can find no convincing argument, however, that the system is made any more fair by taking the death penalty out of it.

Coming full circle to Williams, the law was followed to the T. The Fifth and 14th amendments of the United States Constitution affirm that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Stanley "Tookie" Williams had 25 years of due process.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print      Share Share

More Editorials & Opinion

NEW - 12:45 AM
Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: The peril of lower standards in the 'new journalism'

George Will / Syndicated columnist: Huckabee's detour from reason in Obama theory

Lance Dickie / Seattle Times editorial columnist: Empower health care reform close to home

Rewind | Seattle Times Editorial Board interviews school officials

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: When punishment is a crime

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

Advertising