Advertising

The Seattle Times Company

NWjobs | NWautos | NWhomes | NWsource | Free Classifieds | seattletimes.com

The Seattle Times

Editorials / Opinion


Our network sites seattletimes.com | Advanced

Originally published Saturday, October 8, 2005 at 12:00 AM

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

Editorial

The U.S. Senate's powerful message

This week's 90-9 vote in the U.S. Senate to ban "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of prisoners by the military found a clarity of...

This week's 90-9 vote in the U.S. Senate to ban "cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of prisoners by the military found a clarity of purpose and voice that eludes the Bush administration.

Behind all the shocking revelations of torture at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad and reports of abuse at Guantánamo was a bumbling confusion at the Pentagon and White House that tossed out long-standing rules as they demanded that interrogations yield intelligence. U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., cut through the fog with a timely quote from an Army captain asking for unambiguous guidelines: "Give them clear standards of conduct that reflect the ideals they risk their lives for."

The young veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan had tried and failed to get answers up the chain of command.

Those sentiments were echoed by former Secretary of State Colin Powell, a retired four-star Army general, and 28 other senior military retirees, who also saw guidelines as potentially protecting troops if they became prisoners.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a former judge advocate, noted, "If you don't practice what you preach, nobody listens."

Such rules of behavior project American values as powerfully as any oratory on the desirability of democracy and the rule of law.

The amendment that passed has been around since summer, but the GOP leadership had balked, saying it tied the hands of the executive branch. Eventually, even threats of a presidential veto could not keep this statement down.

The language is appended to a $440 billion military-spending bill. The White House has said the McCain-Graham amendment might be the first veto of the Bush presidency.

A veto would be a tragic mistake, as would the amendment's demise during House-Senate conferences on the competing versions of the military-spending package.

A powerful, bipartisan voice has articulated a basic statement of what is permitted and forbidden with detainees in U.S. control. A handful of words speaks volumes to the rest of the world.

E-mail E-mail article      Print Print view      Share Share

More Editorials & Opinion

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: America's paradox: black men fighting for ideals that exclude them

Lift the levy lid for King County libraries

Leonard Pitts Jr. / Syndicated columnist: President Obama's appeal for civility: The country should come first

More Editorials & Opinion headlines...


Get home delivery today!

Video

Advertising

AP Video

Entertainment | Top Video | World | Offbeat Video | Sci-Tech

Marketplace

 
Most read
Most commented
Most e-mailed
 
 

Most viewed imagesMore

Advertising