anchor link to jump to start of content

The Seattle Times Company NWclassifieds NWsource seattletimes.com
seattletimes.com Editorials and opinion Home delivery Contact us Search archives
Your account  Today's news index  Weather  Traffic  Movies  Restaurants  Today's events
  NWCLASSIFIEDS
  NWSOURCE
  SHOPPING
  SERVICES


Wednesday, November 24, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M.

Editorial
Hone tuition law for intended students


E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive
Most read articles Most read articles
Most e-mailed articles Most e-mailed articles

The Legislature must tighten up a new law that embraces the promise of young people who, through no fault of their own, were brought to this country by parents skirting immigration law.

State Rep. Phyllis Gutierrez Kenney, D-Seattle, who worked hard for the bill, says she'll now work to exclude unintended beneficiaries — international students on temporary visas who do not face the same dire financial challenges.

Last year, Washington state lawmakers and the governor decided to lower the financial barrier to higher education for some young state residents, many of them children of migrant farmworkers, by letting them pay in-state resident tuition.

The difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition — from about $5,000 a year at a community college to $11,000 at the University of Washington — for these mostly poor young people means the difference between going to college or working in the fields.

The case for helping children of Washington's harvest was compelling. The state already makes a significant investment in them, providing education from kindergarten through 12th grade, no questions asked.

And when some of these kids, against the odds, not only learned English but excelled enough to be admitted to college, it made no sense to push a bright future out of their financial reach.

But, as written, the law extends in-state tuition also to some international students with temporary visas. Some came here as exchange students, while others are children of well-paid employees of large companies who have employment visas — in other words, not those students the law was intended to help.

About half of the 86 students who qualified for the program and were admitted to four-year universities this fall are unintended beneficiaries, as are about 13 percent of the 287 at community colleges.

The law was intended to give a hand up to promising young people whose options have been limited due to their parents' decisions and their residency status.

Copyright © 2004 The Seattle Times Company

E-mail E-mail this article
Print Print this article
Print Search archive

More Editorial headlines...

 EDITORIALS & OPINION
 SEARCH

Today Archive

Advanced search

seattletimes.com home
Home delivery | Contact us | Search archive | Site map | Low-graphic
NWclassifieds | NWsource | Advertising info | The Seattle Times Company

Copyright

Back to topBack to top