Originally published August 28, 2009 at 4:24 PM | Page modified August 28, 2009 at 6:31 PM
Comments (0)
E-mail article
Print
Share
Washington state Supreme Court upholds employer's right to fire
The Washington Supreme Court's ruling in Briggs v. Nova Services protects the principle of at-will employment, which is important to running a productive business and a high-wage economy.
THE Washington Supreme Court made the right ruling this week in the case of Briggs v. Nova Services. The court reaffirmed an employer's right to dismiss an employee — a right that is important to running a productive business and a high-wage economy.
The case involved Nova Services, a Spokane nonprofit that helps people with disabilities find jobs. Some managers at Nova went to the board of directors, said the CEO was incompetent and demanded her dismissal.
The board hired an attorney to investigate, and the attorney advised them it could keep either the CEO or two of the managers. The board kept the boss, who fired the two managers. Four other managers and two other employees, who had threatened to quit if this happened, walked out. Later, they filed a lawsuit for wrongful dismissal.
These were employees not covered by a contract. The general rule is that the employer can dismiss such employees at will, without having to prove anything to a third party.
There are exceptions. An "at-will" employee can't be fired for certain public things, like how he votes or how he prays. He cannot be fired for organizing a union. But the list of protections is short, and for good reasons. One is that the ability to dismiss an employee lowers the risk of hiring a new one. Employment at will promotes job creation.
Companies may agree to limit their at-will rights by signing labor contracts. That is their business. It is a whole other thing for the courts to do it for everyone, especially on a flimsy case like this.
The Briggs plaintiffs used a line from a law passed in 1933, declaring it to be state policy to protect workers "in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protections."
This vague statement is in the "whereas" section of a law about injunctions and strikes. It had nothing to do with protecting managers who hated their boss.
It is amazing that only five justices — Jim Johnson, Charles Johnson, Gerry Alexander, Barbara Madsen and Richard Sanders — got it right. Susan Owens, Tom Chambers, Debra Stephens and Mary Fairhurst, who sided with the complaining managers, would have made a mess of the labor law of Washington.
Copyright © The Seattle Times Company
NEW - 5:04 PM
Washington's state House should pass workers compensation reform bill
NEW - 5:05 PM
Breathe easier, a plan to stop burning coal for power
Heed auditor's recommendation about consolidating school health plans
Uncover managers' role in Seattle schools scandal
Detractors of crusade against childhood obesity should eat their words

nwautos
Turismo upgrade "Gran Turismo 5: XL Edition" for PlayStation 3 has features such as new car-tuning settings, new NASCAR vehicles, better replay video...
Post a comment
- Lakewood cop accused of embezzling $150K meant for slain officers' families
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Agency set to investigate handling of 911 call about Josh Powell
- Quick decisions: How Washington hired its new football staff
- Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looms
- Justin Wilcox's versatile defensive style is the right fit for Huskies | Jerry Brewer
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- It's Terrence Time: Enigmatic Ross leads Huskies
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- Club promoter convicted in brutal 2010 murder of Des Moines prostitute
- Gay-marriage bill passes House, awaits Gregoire's signature
490 - Historic day for gay marriage as another fight looming
371 - Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
353 - 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
245 - Council members get briefing on arena proposal, minus details
237 - AP Source: Obama to change birth control rule
231 - Oregon live game thread
155 - Pac-12 picks ... including the UW game
140 - Worker: Josh Powell told son he had 'surprise'
108 - Rough road again
100
- Wanted in Seattle classrooms: more teachers of color
- State Medicaid program to stop paying for unneeded ER visits
- 3 big health insurers stockpile $2.4 billion as rates keep rising
- Economy, blogs give survivalists new reason to look to Northwest
- State's share of mortgage settlement: $648 million
- One man's audacious pursuit of sailing history
- Darren Berg gets 18-year sentence for Ponzi scheme
- Bellevue College adds a third bachelor's degree program
- $25B settlement reached over foreclosure abuses
- 'Gauguin and Polynesia': dazzling mix-and-match | Art review







