Health-care bill should bear Kennedy's name and ideas

SEN. Robert Byrd, the ailing West Virginia Democrat, proposes renaming pending national health-care legislation after longtime colleague, the late Sen. Ted Kennedy.

It's a fine idea, especially if the designation reaches beyond symbolism and sentimentality. Putting Kennedy's name on the bill is a respectful way to honor the senator and his important work to make health care more inclusive and cost-effective.

Congress should not stop there. Once August recess ends, lawmakers should shake off some of the silliness that overwhelmed the debate this summer and consider anew the substance of Kennedy's efforts. He very much wanted the final bill to include a public option.

Without one, the system will not be overhauled, but rather tweaked. Rising costs will continue hammering businesses, government and individuals. Coverage will remain out of reach for many Americans.

Sen. Patty Murray has said several times a public option means 100 different things to 100 different people. Details matter. The government program must be big enough to include people otherwise left out and compel private insurance companies to operate more efficiently.

As for timing, hurry-up deadlines may be the biggest problem so far. Voting, especially with the passing of Kennedy and weakened condition of Byrd, must be orchestrated by a congressional maestro. When can Byrd participate? Who will replace Kennedy to represent Massachusetts, and when? Which Republicans might be persuaded to participate in meaningful reform?

Solid legislation, with a public option but without unreasonable deadlines, can be accomplished for Americans who clamor for better access — and in memory of the late senator who fought so nobly on their behalf.