Originally published June 29, 2009 at 3:06 PM | Page modified June 29, 2009 at 4:29 PM
Comments (5)
E-mail article
Print view
Share
Turning the war over to the Iraqis: Stay on schedule
U.S. forces are on schedule to withdraw from Iraqi towns and cities, and take a step into the background. A welcome move. Stay focused on the next benchmark, the removal of all combat troops by August 2010.
FOR many Americans, an assurance by the top U.S. commander in Iraq that local forces are ready to assume security duties is less important than moving our troops out of harm's way.
Such is the significance of today's scheduled withdrawal of American forces from populated areas.
Congress began pestering the Bush administration in earnest about a deadline for leaving Iraq after the November 2006 congressional elections. The president responded in January 2007 with a surge of U.S. military power, a noun without the historical baggage of escalation.
In addition to the infusion of a robust number of troops — sought by U.S. military commanders before the war began — Americans had been reshaping the effort on the ground among rival civilian populations.
The pullback from Iraqi cities and towns that officially begins today is pointed toward a withdrawal of all combat troops by August 2010 and the exit of all U.S. forces from the country by Dec. 31, 2011.
Words and definitions matter in the eventual arithmetic of leaving Iraq. Although U.S. troop strength has stayed around 130,000, the number of soldiers designated as trainers has surged from 10,000 to 50,000.
Even as Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has declared a great victory against the foreign occupiers, he has U.S. troops on speed dial if conditions overtake local capabilities.
A better word than surge to describe conditions that allow for a lower American profile might be engagement. Approaches were made to factions that had previously battled U.S. forces. Sunni neighborhood groups, organized as Awakening Councils, were trusted and empowered to defend their families and homes against al-Qaida insurgents and others.
Murderous tensions still exist between Shiites, who rule the government, and Sunnis, who held power under Saddam Hussein, but there has been a transition to protecting Iraqi home turf. These Sons of Iraq also went on the payroll, with U.S. taxpayers spending more than $300 million to keep them employed as homegrown security forces.
Iraq in transition will be a dangerous place of factional challenges and testing of central authority and its capacities. A bomb blast Wednesday in a Sadr City market killed 76 persons and injured 156. Also this past week, a truck bomb in northern Iraq, a relatively stable area, killed 68.
The U.S. has spent handsomely to train, equip and invest in Iraqi security forces, and that relationship will not change for years. A formal disengagement of American forces from the war is overdue but welcome news.
Copyright © 2009 The Seattle Times Company
NEW - 4:38 PM
Schools' extreme makeover
The U.S. House should reject the health care bill and start over
The U.S.-Mexico drug war took a bloody turn
Google's beef with China should be negotiated
Legislature rallies for state's students

nwautos
(Volkswagen) Auto guide group reveals 2010 car picks NADAguides.com has announced its "Best Car Buys" for 2010 based on fuel efficiency, warranty cove...
Post a comment
nwjobs
Michelle Goodman blogs about work/life balance.
Make profits, not meetings
Post a comment
- Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16
- Police confirm child's body is that of missing Silverdale boy
- Fess Parker, TV's Davy Crockett and Daniel Boone, dies at 85
- Quincy Pondexter's shot lifts Washington, 80-78
- Seahawks trade for quarterback Charlie Whitehurst
- Authorities scale back Orcas Island search for Colton Harris-Moore
- Husky Men's Basketball Blog | Marquette game thread
- 2 arrested in massive poaching of oysters and clams on Hood Canal
- Goodbye to grand plan for Seattle Center?
- Walmart announcement tells black people to leave store
- Lawmakers struggle to finish health overhaul bill
892 - Marquette game thread
618 - Hoyer says Democratic majority in House is safe
268 - Search for elusive Harris-Moore in full swing on Orcas Island Tuesday
129 - Quincy Pondexter's shot lifts Washington, 80-78
109 - Marquette post-game analysis
92 - Local advocates press Obama for immigration fix
79 - If Congress permits cuts in Medicare payments, seniors might not get needed care
78 - House Dems on track for vote on $940B health bill
61 - Pick the Washington-Marquette winner
61
- Walgreens: no new Medicaid patients as of April 16
- Mountain bikers build a thrilling new Eastside bike park
- Poulsbo postal worker suspected of stealing money from cards
- Walmart announcement tells black people to leave store
- Amazon adds 180,000 square feet to S. Lake Union space
- Little Seattle bank hopes to raise $450M and be a big player
- 2 arrested in massive poaching of oysters and clams on Hood Canal
- Goodbye to grand plan for Seattle Center?
- All You Can Eat | El Pilon, a taste of Puerto Rico in Columbia City
- Nuns' support for health-care bill shows church split









